15.01.2013 Views

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Spreading Prosperity 347<br />

which gets in<strong>to</strong> diplomatic issues, but obliquely, on what keeps them processing<br />

dirty money.<br />

First, the U.S. Patriot Act <strong>to</strong>ok shell banks off the table, barring transfers<br />

in<strong>to</strong> the United States from these camouflaged little subterfuges in the<br />

Caribbean, Channel Isl<strong>and</strong>s, the Pacific, <strong>and</strong> elsewhere. Now it’s time <strong>to</strong><br />

treat shell corporations, trusts, <strong>and</strong> foundations in exactly the same way. Entities<br />

that are hidden behind nominee shareholders, direc<strong>to</strong>rs, <strong>and</strong> trustees<br />

must be equally off the table. No more transfers <strong>to</strong> U.S. or European financial<br />

institutions from disguised businesses <strong>and</strong> bank accounts.<br />

Second, multinational corporations should be discouraged from using<br />

special purpose entities or international business corporations domiciled in<br />

tax havens. Every entity owned or controlled by a multinational corporation,<br />

<strong>to</strong>gether with its place of registration, should be listed in the firm’s<br />

published annual report. Enron’s 800 or so Caribbean financial dumps<br />

would have made very interesting reading.<br />

Third, corporations should be required <strong>to</strong> file reports annually with tax<br />

authorities on the specific business purpose of any entity registered in a tax<br />

haven or secrecy jurisdiction, <strong>to</strong>gether with the entity’s physical location <strong>and</strong><br />

staff level. You may have a legitimate purpose, but the ball is in your court <strong>to</strong><br />

explain it.<br />

The thrust of these points is not aimed at attacking the sovereignty of isl<strong>and</strong><br />

countries <strong>and</strong> tiny enclaves, thus incurring all sorts of diplomatic<br />

wrath. Instead, we make the secret <strong>and</strong> tax-evading entities that keep them<br />

in business much less attractive <strong>to</strong> the users.<br />

Then the huge question is whether corporations should be required <strong>to</strong><br />

publish tax returns. If they were, this would cut through many issues surrounding<br />

corporate tax evasion <strong>and</strong> would exert enormous pressures on corporations<br />

<strong>and</strong> tax havens <strong>to</strong> clean up their acts.<br />

The argument is that a company that is chartered by the state, which<br />

belongs <strong>to</strong> the people, should be accountable <strong>to</strong> the state <strong>and</strong> the people.<br />

Furthermore, a corporation that is publicly owned should be publicly transparent,<br />

particularly in assuring that it is abiding by all laws, tax <strong>and</strong> otherwise,<br />

here <strong>and</strong> elsewhere, in its dealings.<br />

In response, corporations claim that publishing tax information would<br />

reveal corporate information about where profits are earned <strong>and</strong> how costs<br />

<strong>and</strong> revenues are allocated. They want tax subterfuges <strong>to</strong> remain a competitive<br />

secret.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!