15.01.2013 Views

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

366 CAPITALISM’S <strong>ACHILLES</strong> <strong>HEEL</strong><br />

<strong>How</strong>? Teach philosophy. Expose undergraduate <strong>and</strong> graduate students<br />

in business, law, economics, politics, <strong>and</strong> other fields as well, <strong>to</strong><br />

philosophy.<br />

Today, almost all business schools convey a basic lesson—the priority<br />

of maximizing. In other words, the capitalism–utilitarianism union is accepted<br />

as a given <strong>and</strong> transferred <strong>to</strong> young minds as an essential element<br />

in their underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the world. Strict utilitarian philosophy <strong>and</strong> its<br />

stuffed progeni<strong>to</strong>r Jeremy Bentham are rarely mentioned, but students<br />

nevertheless learn <strong>to</strong> act in ways that are not articulated at a philosophical<br />

level. Fundamentally new currents of thinking that are flowing in other<br />

academic departments do not often reach in<strong>to</strong> these classrooms.<br />

If widespread corporate sc<strong>and</strong>als <strong>and</strong> ongoing rampant illegalities have<br />

demonstrated anything it is that the teaching of ethics or organizational<br />

integrity or business responsibility or whatever else it may be called is not<br />

sufficient. Students I have talked <strong>to</strong> say that about half their classmates<br />

emerge from ethics courses thinking they have an obligation only <strong>to</strong> narrowly<br />

obey the law, with the other half thinking that occasionally they<br />

have responsibilities slightly beyond the law, but seldom are they exposed<br />

<strong>to</strong> inquiries that go much deeper than the status quo. The biggest mistake<br />

that learning institutions can make is <strong>to</strong> produce graduates without deeply<br />

inquisitive, intensely curious minds. My question <strong>to</strong> ethics departments in<br />

business, law, <strong>and</strong> economics is: <strong>How</strong> many of your students are graduating<br />

with an awareness that the utilitarian underpinnings of the past two<br />

centuries are under attack <strong>and</strong> that new concepts of justice are rapidly<br />

emerging, potentially having a huge impact on the way we think about the<br />

global community, operate capitalism, do our jobs, <strong>and</strong> live our lives in<br />

decades <strong>to</strong> come?<br />

Thomas Pogge nails this point: “We as individuals have no hope of coping<br />

with . . . complexity <strong>and</strong> interdependence if we take the existing ground<br />

rules for granted <strong>and</strong> merely ask ‘<strong>How</strong> should I act?’ or ‘What should I do<br />

differently?’ We can cope only by attending <strong>to</strong> this all-pervasive scheme of<br />

ground rules which shapes the way persons act <strong>and</strong> co-determines how their<br />

actions, <strong>to</strong>gether, affect the lives of others.” 15<br />

The teaching of ethics should segue in<strong>to</strong> the teaching of philosophy.<br />

Students who have some underst<strong>and</strong>ing of Adam Smith, Jeremy Bentham,<br />

John Rawls, yes Robert Nozick, <strong>and</strong> perhaps also Ronald Dworkin, Michael<br />

Walzer, <strong>and</strong> others will be better equipped <strong>to</strong> deal with the changing world

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!