CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

Notes 421
2. Ibid., 32.
3. Ibid., 45.
4. Ibid., 52.
5. W. Stanley Jevons, The State in Relation to Labour, 4th ed. (New York:
Kelley, 1968), 9.
6. Ibid., 13.
7. Ibid.
8. R.D. Collison Black, “Jevons, Bentham and De Morgan,” Economica
39, no. 154 (May 1972): 127.
9. Henry Sidgwick, The Methods of Ethics, 7th ed. (Indianapolis: Hackett
Publishing, 1981), 503.
10. J.B. Schneewind, Sidgwick’s Ethics and Victorian Moral Philosophy (Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1977), 352.
11. Alfred Marshall, Principles of Economics, vol. II, 9th ed. (Cambridge,
England: Royal Economic Society, 1961), 621.
12. Alfred Marshall, Principles of Economics, vol. I, 9th ed. (New York:
Macmillan, 1920), 760.
13. Ibid., 765.
14. Ibid., 92.
15. Marshall, Principles of Economics, vol. II, 9th ed., 236.
16. Marshall, Principles of Economics, vol. I, 17.
17. Ibid., 22.
18. F.Y. Edgeworth, “Review of the Third Edition of Marshall’s Principles of
Economics,” The Economic Journal 5 (1895): 585–589.
19. Hans E. Jensen, “Alfred Marshall on the Structural and Behavioural
Properties of Social Institutions,” International Journal of Social Economics
19, nos. 10/11/12 (1992): 65.
20. Theodore Levitt, “Alfred Marshall: Victorian Relevance for Modern
Economics,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 90, no. 3 (August 1976):
440–441.
21. Tom Warke, “Mathematical Fitness in the Evolution of the Utility Concept
from Bentham to Jevons to Marshall,” Journal of the History of Economic
Thought 22, no. 1 (2000): 5.
22. Arthur C. Pigou, The Economics of Welfare, 4th ed. (London: Macmillan,
1932), 23.
23. Ibid.
24. Ibid., 11.