15.01.2013 Views

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

CAPITALISM'S ACHILLES HEEL Dirty Money and How to

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

360 CAPITALISM’S <strong>ACHILLES</strong> <strong>HEEL</strong><br />

choice; they are forced <strong>to</strong> accept the same terms. As long as the indebted<br />

country is spending more on education <strong>and</strong> health than the base line, a<br />

portion of its foreign debt is being liquidated.<br />

What does this do for capitalism? It strengthens the market’s opportunities<br />

among five billion people. Every multinational corporation that produces<br />

a product that can be bought in developing <strong>and</strong> transitional countries<br />

should favor debt relief. Corporate interests are not the same as the interests<br />

of the financial community. More than 80 percent of the world’s population<br />

will have greater purchasing power when the unpayable debt is lifted. A winwin<br />

outcome for poor <strong>and</strong> rich alike.<br />

Debt is a roadblock <strong>to</strong> global progress. It’s time <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>p playing penny<br />

ante <strong>and</strong> put all the chips on a bet that the world will be better off when<br />

it’s gone.<br />

RECONSTITUTE THE WORLD BANK<br />

As stated in Chapter 7, the World Bank has never put the whole of the financial<br />

equation for development on the table. It has never analyzed the full<br />

range of illicit outflows in<strong>to</strong> western accounts, causing deprivation <strong>and</strong> slowing<br />

growth in poorer countries. On the principal reason for its existence, it<br />

has not asked the right questions. David Reisman, an economist, once said,<br />

“[T]here is more merit in being fuzzily right than in being precisely<br />

wrong.” 2 My estimate of $500 billion a year passing illegally out of developing<br />

<strong>and</strong> transitional economies in<strong>to</strong> western coffers may be fuzzily right, but<br />

the World Bank, which has failed even <strong>to</strong> ask the question, is precisely<br />

wrong. What assurance can we have that fuller, deeper, more challenging<br />

queries will be posed in the future?<br />

Reconstitute the executive direc<strong>to</strong>rs of the World Bank. They <strong>and</strong><br />

other senior ranks need <strong>to</strong> contain many more sociologists, political scientists,<br />

psychologists <strong>and</strong>, yes, philosophers, people who will ask a wider<br />

range of development questions than the World Bank has been willing <strong>to</strong><br />

ask <strong>to</strong> date. At the moment the Bank is data driven ad nauseam. I’m all<br />

for data. But dependency on statistical analysis means that where there<br />

are no statistics there is no analysis. The Bank has allowed the availability<br />

of data <strong>to</strong> shape the questions, rather than having questions determine<br />

the pursuit of data. For the future, broaden the range of expertise <strong>and</strong> dis-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!