29.01.2013 Views

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hakalau Forest National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge<br />

<strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

dependent on „ōhi„a for food <strong>and</strong> nesting. „I„iwi spend up to 80-90 percent of their time foraging on<br />

„ōhi„a for nectar <strong>and</strong> insects. As they are primarily nectarivorous; the nectar of „ōhi„a <strong>and</strong> māmane<br />

make up a major portion of their diet. The species also feeds on foliage insects <strong>and</strong> spiders (Ralph<br />

<strong>and</strong> Fancy 1995). Other plant species used for foraging on nectar <strong>and</strong> insects include koa, naio, kōlea,<br />

„ākala, alani, kanawao, koki„o ke„oke„o, <strong>and</strong> native lobelioids. Banana poka nectar is a major food<br />

source in some areas (Fancy <strong>and</strong> Ralph 1998).<br />

Breeding season on Hawai„i Isl<strong>and</strong> begins October-November, with peak breeding between<br />

February-June. Breeding coincides with seasonal availability of „ōhi„a nectar. Both sexes defend<br />

small nesting territories <strong>and</strong> may sometimes defend individual „ōhi„a trees as nectar resources. While<br />

„i„iwi are dependent on „ōhi„a for feeding <strong>and</strong> nesting, „i„iwi also serve as important pollinators of<br />

„ōhi„a <strong>and</strong> native lobeliods.<br />

„I‟iwi distribution range is restricted mostly to elevations greater than 4,100 ft because of loss <strong>and</strong><br />

destruction of native forests <strong>and</strong> presence of cold-intolerant Culex mosquitoes that transmit avian<br />

diseases at lower elevations (Scott et al. 1986, van Riper et al. 1986, Atkinson et al. 1995). However,<br />

„i„iwi are known to migrate to lower elevations during the summer. „I„iwi are very susceptible to<br />

avian malaria <strong>and</strong> avian pox. Mortality of experimentally infected „i„iwi is high, with estimates at<br />

90 percent (Atkinson et al. 1995). Individuals infected with pox also are more likely to be infected<br />

with malaria. The KFU has a high prevalence of malaria <strong>and</strong> avian pox, <strong>and</strong> data shows that few<br />

„i„iwi survive the exposure (Atkinson et al. 2005). The presence of pigs in the KFU <strong>and</strong> limited areas<br />

of the HFU may also spread malaria as the compaction of soils <strong>and</strong> felling <strong>and</strong> hollowing of tree<br />

ferns by pigs create favored breeding sites for Culex mosquitoes.„I„iwi fledglings may also be<br />

susceptible to predation by rats <strong>and</strong> cats found in the units (Mitchell et al. 2005).<br />

4.5.2 Common ‘Amakihi (Hemignathus virens)<br />

Male common „amakihi are bright yellow-green with black lores. Females are generally similar, but<br />

duller. All „amakihi have decurved bills. The immatures are drab gray <strong>and</strong> may lack dark lores <strong>and</strong><br />

some have faint wingbars.<br />

The Hawaiian Forest Bird Survey (1976-1983) estimated the Hawai„i „amakihi population at<br />

870,000 ± 5,612 (95 percent CI) individuals on the Isl<strong>and</strong> of Hawai„i, 44,000 ± 1,786 (95 percent CI)<br />

birds on east Maui, 3,000 ± 408 (95 percent CI) on west Maui, <strong>and</strong> 1,800 ± 357 (95 percent CI)<br />

individuals on Moloka„i. Populations on the isl<strong>and</strong>s of Hawai„i <strong>and</strong> Maui are probably stable; the<br />

Moloka„i population is probably declining (Mitchell et al. 2005).<br />

A population of 200,760 + 990 (SE) common „amakihi was estimated to occur within the north<br />

Hāmākua study area, of which 51,600 birds (26 percent) were predicted to occur within the HFU<br />

(Camp et al. 2003). The mean density of common „amakihi for the 14-year study period of surveys<br />

within the HFU (1987-2000) was 5.2 birds per acre (SD = 7.63). Common „amakihi populations<br />

within <strong>and</strong> near the HFU did not show a significantly positive or negative trend in density from 1987-<br />

2000. However, „amakihi density increased over the 24-year study period (1977-2000). From 1999-<br />

2007, the population of common „amakihi at the HFU was also stable or increasing. The population<br />

was estimated to potentially have increased at a mean rate of 2.5 percent per year (95 percent CI -7.9-<br />

12.9 percent) (Hawai„i Forest Database 2005). Common „amakihi demonstrated low within-year but<br />

moderately high between-year variability in density.<br />

Chapter 4. Refuge Biology <strong>and</strong> Habitats 4-33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!