29.01.2013 Views

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hakalau Forest National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge<br />

<strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

effects on species <strong>and</strong>/or degrade environmental quality. The lack of data on the toxicity of<br />

degradates for many pesticides would represent a source of uncertainty for assessing risk.<br />

An USEPA-approved label specifies whether a product can be mixed with one or more pesticides.<br />

Without product-specific toxicological data, it would not be possible to quantify the potential effects<br />

of these mixtures. In addition, a quantitative analysis could only be conducted if reliable scientific<br />

information allowed a determination of whether the joint action of a mixture would be additive,<br />

synergistic, or antagonistic. Such information would not likely exist unless the mode of action would<br />

be common among the chemicals <strong>and</strong> receptors. Moreover, the composition of <strong>and</strong> exposure to<br />

mixtures would be highly site- <strong>and</strong>/or time-specific <strong>and</strong>, therefore, it would be nearly impossible to<br />

assess potential effects to species <strong>and</strong> environmental quality.<br />

To minimize or eliminate potential negative effects associated with applying two or more pesticides<br />

as a mixture, the use would be conducted in accordance with the labeling requirements. Labels for<br />

two or more pesticides applied as a mixture should be completely reviewed, where products with the<br />

least potential for negative effects would be selected for use on the refuge. This is especially relevant<br />

when a mixture would be applied in a manner that may already have the potential for an effect(s)<br />

associated with an individual pesticide (e.g., runoff to ponds in s<strong>and</strong>y watersheds). Use of a tank mix<br />

under these conditions would increase the level of uncertainty in terms of risk to species or potential<br />

to degrade environmental quality.<br />

Adjuvants generally function to enhance or prolong the activity of pesticide. For terrestrial<br />

herbicides, adjuvants aid in the absorption into plant tissue. Adjuvant is a broad term that generally<br />

applies to surfactants, selected oils, anti-foaming agents, buffering compounds, drift control agents,<br />

compatibility agents, stickers, <strong>and</strong> spreaders. Adjuvants are not under the same registration<br />

requirements as pesticides <strong>and</strong> the USEPA does not register or approve the labeling of spray<br />

adjuvants. Individual pesticide labels identify types of adjuvants approved for use with it. In<br />

general, adjuvants compose a relatively small portion of the volume of pesticides applied. Selection<br />

of adjuvants with limited toxicity <strong>and</strong> low volumes would be recommended to reduce the potential<br />

for the adjuvant to influence the toxicity of the pesticide.<br />

7.4 Determining Effects to Soil <strong>and</strong> Water Quality<br />

The approval process for pesticide uses would consider potential to degrade water quality on <strong>and</strong> off<br />

refuge l<strong>and</strong>s. A pesticide can only affect water quality through movement away from the treatment<br />

site. After application, pesticide mobilization can be characterized by one or more of the following<br />

(Kerle et al. 1996):<br />

• Attach (sorb) to soil, vegetation, or other surfaces <strong>and</strong> remain at or near the treated area;<br />

• Attach to soil <strong>and</strong> move off-site through erosion from run-off or wind;<br />

• Dissolve in water that can be subjected to run-off or leaching.<br />

As an initial screening tool, selected chemical characteristics <strong>and</strong> rating criteria for a pesticide can be<br />

evaluated to assess potential to enter ground <strong>and</strong>/or surface waters. These would include the<br />

following: persistence, sorption coefficient (Koc), groundwater ubiquity score (GUS), <strong>and</strong> solubility.<br />

Persistence, which is expressed as half-life (t½), represents the length of time required for 50% of the<br />

deposited pesticide to degrade (completely or partially). Persistence in the soil can be categorized as<br />

Appendix G. Integrated Pest Management G-31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!