29.01.2013 Views

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.2.1 Environmental exposure<br />

Hakalau Forest National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge<br />

<strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Following release into the environment through application, pesticides would experience several<br />

different routes of environmental fate. Pesticides which would be sprayed can move through the air<br />

(e.g., particle or vapor drift) <strong>and</strong> may eventually end up in other parts of the environment such as<br />

non-target vegetation, soil, or water. Pesticides applied directly to the soil may be washed off the<br />

soil into nearby bodies of surface water (e.g., surface runoff) or may percolate through the soil to<br />

lower soil layers <strong>and</strong> groundwater (e.g., leaching) (Baker <strong>and</strong> Miller 1999, Pope et. al. 1999, Butler<br />

et. al. 1998, Ramsay et. al. 1995, EXTOXNET 1993a). Pesticides which would be injected into the<br />

soil may also be subject to the latter two fates. The aforementioned possibilities are by no means<br />

complete, but it does indicate movement of pesticides in the environment is very complex with<br />

transfers occurring continually among different environmental compartments. In some cases, these<br />

exchanges occur not only between areas that are close together, but it also may involve transportation<br />

of pesticides over long distances (Barry 2004, Woods 2004).<br />

7.2.1.1 Terrestrial exposure<br />

The estimated environmental concentration (ECC) for exposure to terrestrial wildlife would be<br />

quantified using an USEPA screening-level approach (US Environmental Protection Agency 2004).<br />

This screening-level approach is not affected by product formulation because it evaluates pesticide<br />

active ingredient(s). This approach would vary depending upon the proposed pesticide application<br />

method: spray or granular.<br />

7.2.1.1.1 Terrestrial-spray application<br />

For spray applications, exposure would be determined using the Kanaga nomogram method (US<br />

Environmental Protection Agency 2005a, US Environmental Protection Agency 2004, Pfleeger et al.<br />

1996) through the USEPA’s Terrestrial Residue Exposure model (T-REX) version 1.2.3 (US<br />

Environmental Protection Agency 2005b). To estimate the maximum (initial) pesticide residue on<br />

short grass (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!