29.01.2013 Views

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hakalau Forest National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge<br />

<strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

When preparing a CCP, refuge managers must reevaluate all general public, recreational, <strong>and</strong><br />

economic uses (even those occurring to further refuge habitat management goals) proposed or<br />

occurring on a refuge for appropriateness <strong>and</strong> compatibility. No refuge use may be allowed or<br />

continued unless it is determined to be appropriate <strong>and</strong> compatible. Generally, an appropriate use is<br />

one that contributes to fulfilling the refuge purpose(s), the Refuge System mission, or goals or<br />

objectives described in a refuge management plan, such as this CCP. A compatible use is a use that,<br />

in the sound professional judgment of the refuge manager, will not materially interfere with or<br />

detract from the fulfillment of the mission of the Refuge System or the purposes of the refuge.<br />

Updated Appropriateness Findings <strong>and</strong> Compatibility Determinations for existing <strong>and</strong> proposed uses<br />

for Hakalau Forest NWR are in Appendix B.<br />

The Administration Act also requires that, in addition to formally established guidance, the CCP<br />

must be developed with the participation of the public. Issues <strong>and</strong> concerns articulated by the public<br />

played a role in guiding the development of the CCP, <strong>and</strong> together with the formal guidance, played a<br />

role in development of the final CCP. It is the Service’s policy to invite public participation in CCP<br />

development, to carry out an open public CCP process, <strong>and</strong> secure public input throughout the<br />

process.<br />

1.5 Relationship to Previous <strong>and</strong> Future Refuge <strong>Plan</strong>s<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>ning has been a part of refuge operations since establishing refuges began. However, not all<br />

plans were completed in a comprehensive fashion, or with public participation considered adequate<br />

today. For Hakalau Forest NWR, a considerable number of plans were completed over the years to<br />

guide managers.<br />

1.5.1 Previous <strong>Plan</strong>s<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>s <strong>and</strong>/or management agreements (plans addressing one program or resource) have been<br />

developed for Hakalau Forest NWR (Hakalau Forest Unit <strong>and</strong> Kona Forest Unit). Existing plans<br />

include:<br />

� Refuge Management <strong>Plan</strong> (1989);<br />

� Feral Ungulate Management <strong>Plan</strong> (1996);<br />

� Draft Reforestation Management <strong>Plan</strong> (May 1996);<br />

� Wildl<strong>and</strong> Fire Management <strong>Plan</strong>-Hakalau (2002);<br />

� Wildl<strong>and</strong> Fire Management <strong>Plan</strong>-Kona (2002);<br />

� Occupant Emergency <strong>Plan</strong> (2003);<br />

� Annual Habitat Work <strong>Plan</strong> (2004);<br />

� Visitor Services Evaluation Report (2004);<br />

� Safety <strong>Plan</strong>, Hakalau Forest Unit (April 2004);<br />

� Aviation Mishap Response <strong>Plan</strong> (2005);<br />

� Continuity of Operations <strong>Plan</strong> (2009);<br />

� Fleet Management <strong>Plan</strong> (2009);<br />

� USFWS P<strong>and</strong>emic Influenza <strong>Plan</strong> (2009); <strong>and</strong><br />

� Medical Emergency Dispatch <strong>Plan</strong> (2009).<br />

Chapter 1. Introduction <strong>and</strong> Background 1-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!