29.01.2013 Views

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hakalau Forest National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge<br />

<strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Chapter 2. Refuge Management Direction<br />

2.1 Considerations in the Design of the CCP<br />

The Refuge reviewed <strong>and</strong> considered a variety of resource, social, economic, <strong>and</strong> organizational<br />

aspects important for managing the Refuge. These background conditions are described more fully in<br />

Chapters 3, 4, <strong>and</strong> 5. In addition, past <strong>and</strong> current management actions were also considered (a<br />

summary of which can be found in Appendix L). As is appropriate for a national wildlife refuge,<br />

resource considerations were fundamental in designing alternatives. House Report 105-106<br />

accompanying the Improvement Act states “…the fundamental mission of our System is wildlife<br />

conservation: wildlife <strong>and</strong> wildlife conservation must come first.” The CCP team reviewed scientific<br />

reports <strong>and</strong> studies to better underst<strong>and</strong> ecosystem trends <strong>and</strong> the latest scientific recommendations<br />

for species <strong>and</strong> habitats. Refuge staff met with elected officials <strong>and</strong> staff from local, State, <strong>and</strong><br />

Federal agencies to ascertain priorities <strong>and</strong> problems as perceived by others. Refuge staff also met<br />

with Refuge users, nonprofit or nongovernmental groups (NGOs), university/academic members, <strong>and</strong><br />

community organizations to ensure that their comments <strong>and</strong> ideas were considered during CCP<br />

development.<br />

Refuge staff developed tables of focal species, conservation targets, <strong>and</strong> supporting habitats for<br />

Refuge management (Appendix F) based upon the Refuge purposes for Hakalau Forest NWR, a<br />

variety of national, regional, <strong>and</strong> State plans, <strong>and</strong> discussion with Service biologists, managers, <strong>and</strong><br />

outside researchers. These conservation targets provide the basis for our habitat management goals,<br />

objectives, <strong>and</strong> strategies.<br />

2.2 General Guidelines<br />

General guidelines for implementing the CCP follow, as do maps that summarize the CCP actions by<br />

the Refuge. To reduce the length <strong>and</strong> redundancy of the descriptions for each unit, common features<br />

are presented below.<br />

Ungulate-proof Boundary Fencing <strong>and</strong> Sequence of Management Actions (HFU <strong>and</strong> KFU):<br />

The perimeter (ownership) boundary of Hakalau Forest NWR will be enclosed by fencing, with<br />

internal fencing to divide into management units following. Establishing perimeter boundary fencing<br />

is a critical first step in habitat protection <strong>and</strong> restoration to deter major threats to the ecosystem <strong>and</strong><br />

their impacts to wildlife population <strong>and</strong> species recovery. Once fences are established, the st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

management strategy sequence would be to remove ungulates, then concentrate on invasive species<br />

control (e.g., invasive plants, predators such as rats, mongooses, cats, <strong>and</strong> dogs) while simultaneously<br />

restoring habitat through native plant outplantings. Surveys <strong>and</strong> monitoring for threats (e.g., invasive<br />

weeds, ungulates, predators, etc.) would be ongoing as well as species <strong>and</strong> habitat monitoring. If<br />

threats are found, they will be eradicated or controlled. Protection of special habitats (e.g., Carex sp.<br />

bogs) <strong>and</strong> endangered plant outplantings would occur once habitats are stabilized <strong>and</strong> threats<br />

managed <strong>and</strong> include actions such as site-specific fencing.<br />

Maintaining/Upgrading Existing Facilities <strong>and</strong> Fences: Periodic maintenance <strong>and</strong> upgrading of<br />

Refuge buildings, fences, <strong>and</strong> facilities will be necessary for safety <strong>and</strong> accessibility <strong>and</strong> to support<br />

Chapter 2. Refuge Management Direction 2-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!