29.01.2013 Views

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hakalau Forest National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge<br />

<strong>Comprehensive</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

identified in the project proposal will require submission of a subsequent proposal for review <strong>and</strong><br />

approval. In addition, a new SUP will be required for additional project work;<br />

� Investigator(s) <strong>and</strong> support staff will follow all Refuge-specific regulations that specify access<br />

<strong>and</strong> travel on the Refuge;<br />

� At any time, Refuge staff may accompany the researchers;<br />

� Only projects which have no effect or will result in not likely to adversely affect determinations<br />

will be considered compatible;<br />

� After approval, all projects also will be assessed during implementation to ensure impacts <strong>and</strong><br />

conflicts remain within acceptable levels; <strong>and</strong><br />

� Projects which are not covered by the CCP or subsequent stepdown plans may require additional<br />

NEPA documentation.<br />

Justification:<br />

Operation of the UH field station at the Refuge can contribute to the achievement of the Refuge<br />

purpose <strong>and</strong> the mission of the Service. Research performed by UH faculty <strong>and</strong> students <strong>and</strong> other<br />

research partners exp<strong>and</strong>s underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the unique wildlife, diverse native habitats, management<br />

programs, <strong>and</strong> mission of Hakalau Forest NWR <strong>and</strong> the Refuge System.<br />

Because the aforementioned MOA contains specific conditions for minimizing adverse effects to<br />

Refuge resources associated with operation of the field station, it is anticipated that wildlife<br />

populations will find sufficient food resources <strong>and</strong> resting places such that their abundance <strong>and</strong> use of<br />

the Refuge will not be measurably lessened from these activities. The relatively limited number of<br />

individuals expected to be adversely affected from these activities will not cause wildlife populations<br />

to materially decline, the physiological condition <strong>and</strong> production of native wildlife species will not be<br />

impaired, their behavior <strong>and</strong> normal activity patterns will not be altered dramatically, <strong>and</strong> their<br />

overall welfare will not be negatively impacted. Allowing field station operations to occur with<br />

stipulations will not materially detract or interfere with the purposes for which the Refuge was<br />

established or the Refuge System mission.<br />

M<strong>and</strong>atory 10- or 15-year Reevaluation Date:<br />

____________ M<strong>and</strong>atory 15-year reevaluation date (for wildlife-dependent public uses)<br />

_____X______ M<strong>and</strong>atory 10-year reevaluation date (for nonwildlife-dependent public uses)<br />

NEPA Compliance for Refuge Use Decision (check one below)<br />

___Categorical Exclusion without Environmental Action Statement<br />

___Categorical Exclusion <strong>and</strong> Environmental Action Statement<br />

_X Environmental Assessment <strong>and</strong> Finding of No Significant Impact<br />

___Environmental Impact Statement <strong>and</strong> Record of Decision<br />

B-80 Appendix B: Appropriate Uses <strong>and</strong> Compatibility Determinations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!