04.04.2013 Views

1996 Electronics Industry Environmental Roadmap - Civil and ...

1996 Electronics Industry Environmental Roadmap - Civil and ...

1996 Electronics Industry Environmental Roadmap - Civil and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix E<br />

The goal of the source identification <strong>and</strong> evaluation process was to find useful data, information,<br />

“tools,” knowledgeable individuals, organizations, <strong>and</strong> programs that would prove practical to<br />

the electronics industry in better underst<strong>and</strong>ing the state-of-the-art with respect to:<br />

200<br />

Quantities of pollutants emitted by chemical, product, route, industry sector, <strong>and</strong> process;<br />

Successful programs of source reduction, pollution prevention, or waste minimization;<br />

Computer programs that could provide model solution alternatives or planning for source<br />

reduction, pollution prevention, <strong>and</strong> waste minimization; <strong>and</strong><br />

Government program resources available to the private sector to identify pollution<br />

prevention alternatives.<br />

As an example of the manner in which the identified sources <strong>and</strong> their component data <strong>and</strong> information<br />

might be used by the industry for identifying pollution prevention goals <strong>and</strong> objectives,<br />

several of the sources (number 1 - IPPS <strong>and</strong> number 4 - CES Report) will be discussed briefly.<br />

These programs relied on available federal government data, including:<br />

TRI data (U.S. EPA)<br />

Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS - U.S. EPA)<br />

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES - U.S. EPA)<br />

Human Health <strong>and</strong> Ecotoxicity Database (HEED - U.S. EPA)<br />

Toxicological Potency Indices (U.S. EPA)<br />

Longitudinal Research Database (LRD - U.S. Bur. of the Census)<br />

Pollution Abatement Cost <strong>and</strong> Expenditures Survey (PACE - U.S. Bur. of the Census)<br />

Although the approaches used by the two groups differed slightly in terms of outcome <strong>and</strong> data<br />

sources, both activities had similar objectives—to use existing data resources to identify products<br />

<strong>and</strong> processes that were major sources of pollution <strong>and</strong> energy use in particular industries.<br />

Results were characterized in terms of “pollution intensity” for specific industries, or, when<br />

possible, pollution intensity identified with particular products manufactured within these<br />

industries.<br />

In summary, the TRI database provided accurate estimates of toxic chemical releases for approximately<br />

300 possible chemicals for individual establishments for a given year (e.g., 1987, 1990).<br />

The AIRS database provided establishment level data on EPA’s priority pollutants (e.g., SO2,<br />

NO2, CO, VOCs), which are not part of the TRI database. The NPDES data provided pollution<br />

discharge estimates by establishment into waste water for several non-TRI substances, including<br />

BOD, total suspended solids (TSS), <strong>and</strong> pH. The HEED data were used to estimate toxicological<br />

potencies for individual chemicals. The LRD data (which are of limited public accessibility)<br />

were used to provide costs of materials <strong>and</strong> energy, capital expenditures, total value added to<br />

product categories, quantities of specific products produced, <strong>and</strong> the value of individual<br />

shipments, by establishment. The important common denominator among these various data<br />

sources was the individual establishment. Because these data could be tied to a particular<br />

establishment for a specific year, a series of algorithms could be constructed to relate pollution

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!