1996 Electronics Industry Environmental Roadmap - Civil and ...
1996 Electronics Industry Environmental Roadmap - Civil and ...
1996 Electronics Industry Environmental Roadmap - Civil and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Strategic Business Opportunities<br />
Prototype Facilities: Companies could collaborate in establishing prototype programs <strong>and</strong><br />
facilities for managing significant environmental issues. For example, several pilot<br />
product disposition programs, such as the American Plastic Council’s research program<br />
on plastic recycling are currently underway, most with some industrial involvement.<br />
Research programs, equipment development, process improvement, infrastructure<br />
development—all of these lend themselves to collaborative initiatives, <strong>and</strong> many are<br />
ideally suited for cross-industry cooperation or public/private partnerships.<br />
Model Permitting Processes: In some states, electronics <strong>and</strong> computer companies have<br />
worked with state regulators to develop model permitting processes that would accelerate<br />
permit approval. This occurs by specifying certain st<strong>and</strong>ards that are mutually acceptable<br />
to industry <strong>and</strong> regulators. To the extent an individual permit applicant meets the stated<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards, permit approval would be expedited <strong>and</strong> substantial cost savings could accrue<br />
to the company. Proposals for the elements of these st<strong>and</strong>ard permits could be developed<br />
on a national basis <strong>and</strong> made available to regulators through professional channels in an<br />
effort to promote consistency among jurisdictions.<br />
Several models exist that could form the basis for innovative model permitting proposals.<br />
For example, the “Dutch Covenant System” encourages self-regulation within a<br />
framework developed <strong>and</strong> agreed upon jointly by industry <strong>and</strong> government. The<br />
framework includes performance-based, quantitative objectives, with emission targets for<br />
priority substances apportioned among industry sectors. <strong>Industry</strong> is then responsible for<br />
determining the best approach to meeting the st<strong>and</strong>ards, <strong>and</strong> documents its strategies <strong>and</strong><br />
tactics in company environmental management plans. These plans are incorporated in<br />
company-specific licenses <strong>and</strong> permits, <strong>and</strong> updated regularly. A major benefit of the<br />
covenant approach is increased communication <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing among parties<br />
involved in the regulatory process, which yields lower barriers to cooperation in the long<br />
run. Another approach is EPA’s model-permitting program, which develops a spirit of<br />
partnership in the permitting process. An example of this approach is the Intel<br />
Corporation’s P4 Project.<br />
Intel Case: P4 Project<br />
In late 1993, Intel Corporation, the U.S. EPA, <strong>and</strong> the Oregon Department of<br />
<strong>Environmental</strong> Quality entered into a partnership to evaluate opportunities to<br />
incorporate flexibility <strong>and</strong> pollution prevention into permits issued under Title V<br />
of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. The Pollution Prevention in Permitting<br />
Pilot (P4) Project was undertaken to develop a facility-specific permit that<br />
incorporates pollution prevention as a model permit condition for achieving<br />
regulatory compliance. The project’s goals are to develop an implementable<br />
permit, identify regulatory barriers affecting pollution reduction alternatives,<br />
document the process, <strong>and</strong> develop options <strong>and</strong> alternatives that can be useful to<br />
others.<br />
The project demonstrated that pollution prevention performs equally well in the<br />
reduction of air emissions as do traditional, regulatory-specific, end-of-pipe<br />
23