15.04.2014 Views

Linking Culture and the Environment

Linking Culture and the Environment

Linking Culture and the Environment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 5.4. Underlying attitudinal dimensions.<br />

Statement<br />

Factor 1<br />

(E-values)<br />

Factor 2<br />

(E-values)<br />

Factor 3<br />

(E-values)<br />

Factor 4<br />

(E-values)<br />

Factor 5<br />

(E-values)<br />

Factor 6<br />

(E-values)<br />

Factor 7<br />

(E-values)<br />

a. Tourism provides desirable jobs 0.07842 0.81528 0.09339 −0.09951 0.02081 −0.01904 0.07904<br />

b. My community should become more<br />

0.33957 0.39197 −0.32327 −0.36344 0.18589 0.40817 −0.27890<br />

of a tourist destination<br />

c. Tourism in my region has improved<br />

0.64540 0.22945 −0.01875 −0.30026 0.02997 −0.08011 0.07068<br />

my st<strong>and</strong>ard of living<br />

d. More outdoor recreation development<br />

−0.16557 −0.38428 0.24038 0.71252 −0.01790 −0.00938 −0.03076<br />

is not desirable<br />

e. I am against new tourism development<br />

−0.16173 −0.26210 0.45497 0.61974 −0.04036 −0.23057 −0.07075<br />

which will attract new tourists to this region<br />

f. Because of tourism, I have more recreational 0.60755 0.15293 −0.18096 −0.34317 0.24917 0.09255 0.05130<br />

opportunities available to me<br />

g. It is important to provide recreation facilities −0.04201 −0.03467 −0.01482 0.73803 −0.21541 0.01692 −0.01260<br />

for local people ra<strong>the</strong>r than tourists<br />

h. Noise levels from <strong>the</strong> existing tourism facilities −0.06971 −0.17891 0.46047 0.20772 −0.11448 −0.52798 −0.27710<br />

are not appropriate for this region<br />

i. Tourism has negatively impacted <strong>the</strong> natural −0.24217 −0.13332 0.43821 0.48234 −0.13579 −0.35030 −0.22331<br />

environment in <strong>the</strong> region<br />

j. I believe tourism should be actively<br />

0.31656 0.16615 −0.30188 −0.45331 0.44215 0.38419 −0.18318<br />

encouraged in <strong>the</strong> region<br />

k. Tourism has a vital role in <strong>the</strong> region 0.36455 0.46958 −0.23092 −0.35796 0.33810 0.18553 −0.05873<br />

l. The benefits of tourism outweigh any<br />

0.32096 0.38246 −0.22588 −0.38842 0.35286 0.06554 −0.00780<br />

negative consequences<br />

m. Tourists are valuable 0.20861 0.52608 −0.47200 −0.20981 −0.03776 0.33829 0.04327<br />

n. The quality of public services has improved<br />

0.63546 0.27367 −0.04815 0.18155 0.21258 −0.13505 0.40965<br />

due to increased tourism in <strong>the</strong> region<br />

o. The region has better roads due to tourism 0.39264 0.04823 0.00569 −0.00444 −0.13592 −0.71955 0.01157<br />

p. Tourism has increased crime in <strong>the</strong> region −0.10697 −0.09716 0.75108 0.01749 0.02618 −0.15725 −0.02811<br />

q. There is more litter in <strong>the</strong> region due to tourism −0.10304 0.10867 0.81716 0.11854 −0.11611 0.12001 −0.05647<br />

Continued<br />

R.J. Payne et al. 91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!