15.04.2014 Views

Linking Culture and the Environment

Linking Culture and the Environment

Linking Culture and the Environment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

U. Jamrozy <strong>and</strong> J.A. Walsh 133<br />

bination of <strong>the</strong>m intended to identify <strong>the</strong> goods <strong>and</strong> services of one seller or<br />

group of sellers <strong>and</strong> to differentiate <strong>the</strong>m from those of competition’ (www.<br />

marketingpower.com). Br<strong>and</strong>ing is associated with <strong>the</strong> activity of creating,<br />

managing <strong>and</strong> positioning br<strong>and</strong>s:<br />

Br<strong>and</strong>s differentiate products <strong>and</strong> represent a promise of value. Br<strong>and</strong>s incite<br />

beliefs, evoke emotions, <strong>and</strong> prompt behaviors. Marketers often extend<br />

successful br<strong>and</strong> names to new product launches, lending existing<br />

associations to <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

(Kotler <strong>and</strong> Gertner, 2002, p. 249)<br />

Consumers associate <strong>the</strong> br<strong>and</strong> name with a certain reputation, <strong>and</strong> similar<br />

to classical conditioning, respond to a br<strong>and</strong> name in a favourable or unfavourable<br />

manner because it signifies certain qualities. Associated with br<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> br<strong>and</strong>ing are concepts such as br<strong>and</strong> equity, br<strong>and</strong> image, br<strong>and</strong> personality,<br />

br<strong>and</strong> identity <strong>and</strong> br<strong>and</strong> strategy. The concepts have been used widely<br />

for <strong>the</strong> marketing of products <strong>and</strong> organizations (Aaker, 1996; de Chernatony<br />

<strong>and</strong> Dall’Olmo Riley, 1998; Keller, 1998), <strong>and</strong> tourism marketers have quickly<br />

adopted br<strong>and</strong>ing to destinations. Many researchers have used <strong>the</strong> constructs<br />

synonymously, such as in research models, <strong>the</strong>y replace ‘attitude towards <strong>the</strong><br />

br<strong>and</strong>’ with ‘attitudes towards <strong>the</strong> destination’, or <strong>the</strong>y discuss ‘br<strong>and</strong> loyalty’<br />

or ‘br<strong>and</strong> personality’ for destinations. One of <strong>the</strong> first questions to be<br />

resolved is if destinations can be treated as br<strong>and</strong>s. Most authors concede<br />

that tourism products are similar to services <strong>and</strong> experiences, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore<br />

have special characteristics such as intangibility, heterogeneity, inseparability,<br />

<strong>and</strong> perishability (Shostack, 1977), as well as affective experiential components.<br />

Attractions such as Disney World have successfully created a br<strong>and</strong><br />

image. Some researchers argue that destinations can be compared to corporate<br />

br<strong>and</strong>s ra<strong>the</strong>r than product br<strong>and</strong>s. From this perspective, marketers do<br />

not just create a br<strong>and</strong> image for a newly created product, but establish a<br />

reputation for all corporate activities.<br />

Hankinson (2004) compared place br<strong>and</strong>ing to classical product br<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory <strong>and</strong> identified four mainstreams of br<strong>and</strong> conceptualizations. He<br />

established:<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

Br<strong>and</strong>s are communicators – beyond <strong>the</strong> br<strong>and</strong> logos, taglines, etc., br<strong>and</strong>s<br />

have an identity that develops <strong>the</strong> products differentiation fur<strong>the</strong>r by<br />

communicating <strong>the</strong> firm’s vision of <strong>the</strong> br<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Br<strong>and</strong>s are perceptual entities – in this conceptualization, br<strong>and</strong>s were<br />

regarded as having a public image that appeals to <strong>the</strong> consumers’ sense,<br />

reason <strong>and</strong> emotions. This conceptualization is close to a destination’s<br />

image <strong>and</strong> represents ‘what <strong>the</strong> consumer perceives, while identities are<br />

defined as what vision <strong>the</strong> firm tries to communicate’ (p. 111).<br />

Br<strong>and</strong>s are value enhancers – br<strong>and</strong>s have been regarded as corporate assets<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore led to <strong>the</strong> development of br<strong>and</strong> equity. ‘The role of br<strong>and</strong><br />

management from this perspective is to define <strong>and</strong> manage a br<strong>and</strong> identity<br />

as a means of achieving a competitive advantage’ (p. 111).<br />

Br<strong>and</strong> as relationships – here, <strong>the</strong> br<strong>and</strong> is conceptualized as having a personality<br />

that enables it to have a relationship with its stakeholders.<br />

Br<strong>and</strong>ing activities now go beyond communication of images <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!