15.04.2014 Views

Linking Culture and the Environment

Linking Culture and the Environment

Linking Culture and the Environment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

R.E. Mitchell 175<br />

Terrorism: several years of terrorism not only eliminated tourism as an<br />

economic option for Chiquian <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cordillera Huayhuash, it created difficulties<br />

for residents in openly welcoming strangers. A sense of fear <strong>and</strong><br />

suspicion was evident at <strong>the</strong> time of field research in 1997, perhaps attributable<br />

to <strong>the</strong> aftermath of a very traumatic period. Terrorism most certainly<br />

affects tourism negatively – residents <strong>and</strong> visitors alike. The image of safety<br />

is significant from a national or international perspective of tourists <strong>and</strong><br />

travel agencies, <strong>and</strong> also from a local perspective of residents. Safety is still a<br />

concern in <strong>the</strong> Cordillera Huayhuash with some incidents of hikers being<br />

robbed or assaulted in recent years.<br />

Community Perspectives: a Comparative Analysis<br />

Finding new models of sustainability is an inclusive process. All stakeholders<br />

should be involved at <strong>the</strong> initiation of a project, including both <strong>the</strong> local<br />

community <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> private sector (Epler Wood, 1998b). This is not to suggest<br />

that <strong>the</strong> path will be smooth going. Tourism development requires a slow<br />

process of community building, particularly when conventional stakeholders<br />

(residents, entrepreneurs, politicians <strong>and</strong> tourism advocates) do not view<br />

it as a productive activity (Reed, 1997). Moreover, community building may<br />

not be an easy process to initiate <strong>and</strong> maintain given <strong>the</strong> many pitfalls <strong>and</strong><br />

pathways along <strong>the</strong> way as illustrated throughout this book.<br />

On Taquile Isl<strong>and</strong>, many years passed until most residents became convinced<br />

of <strong>the</strong> economic advantages of tourism. Yet clearly greater individual<br />

involvement <strong>and</strong> influence on <strong>the</strong> future of tourism existed compared to<br />

Chiquian. Frequent discussions among isl<strong>and</strong>er residents occurred before<br />

allowing tourism to occur. Several individuals did more than merely promote<br />

<strong>the</strong> isl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> its unique culture to <strong>the</strong> outside world; <strong>the</strong>y employed a<br />

deliberate process of awareness raising or conscientization (Freire, 1970).<br />

Taquile directed its own tourism development through self-awareness <strong>and</strong><br />

self-reliance. In contrast, <strong>the</strong> average resident in Chiquian demonstrates minimal<br />

awareness of <strong>the</strong> local tourism industry <strong>and</strong> few opportunities to participate<br />

in its management <strong>and</strong> potential benefits.<br />

Since its beginnings in <strong>the</strong> 1970s, tourism planning on Taquile was a<br />

participatory, albeit unstructured, process. As a process of empowerment,<br />

‘participation helps local people to identify problems <strong>and</strong> become involved<br />

in decision-making <strong>and</strong> implementation, all of which contribute to sustainable<br />

development’ (France, 1997, p. 149). Rocha (1997) delineates five types<br />

of ‘empowerment’ within planning, of which perhaps <strong>the</strong> most relevant to<br />

Taquile is ‘socio-political empowerment’, defined as ‘<strong>the</strong> development of a<br />

politicized link between individual circumstance <strong>and</strong> community conditions<br />

through collective social action, challenging oppressive institutional<br />

arrangements’ (Rocha, 1997, p. 34). Given <strong>the</strong>ir traditional sense of duty to<br />

<strong>the</strong> community <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir intrinsic participatory nature, a tourism ‘dialogue’<br />

was conceived <strong>and</strong> established through public discussions <strong>and</strong> entrenched<br />

by community laws.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!