01.05.2014 Views

2. Mangatawa catchment consents for earthworks, storm water ...

2. Mangatawa catchment consents for earthworks, storm water ...

2. Mangatawa catchment consents for earthworks, storm water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NZ Transport Agency and Tauranga City Council<br />

<strong>Mangatawa</strong> Drain Flood Bypass and TEM Storm<strong>water</strong> AEE<br />

6. Alternatives Considered<br />

An investigative process was developed to find possible solutions to manage the <strong>storm</strong><strong>water</strong> derived from the<br />

proposed TEM and to reduce the frequency of spills across the State Highway. The process is outlined in<br />

Section 8 Consultation. For the purposes of this report we refer to the activities related to the flooding issue<br />

as the <strong>Mangatawa</strong> Flood By-pass and the issues related to the TEM roadway are referred to as the TEM roadway<br />

<strong>storm</strong><strong>water</strong>.<br />

To address these issues there are three overarching philosophies that could be adopted:<br />

• Leave the situation as it is;<br />

• Prevent spill across SH 2 completely in up to a 100 year <strong>storm</strong>;<br />

• Balanced spill option – managed spill and mitigate effects.<br />

Retaining the existing situation is not a desirable option, because it involves an unacceptable level of risk to<br />

urban areas of Papamoa, including the proposed developments in the Maranui <strong>catchment</strong>, e.g. on the Asher<br />

Block. In addition it allows regular spills across the TEM resulting in frequent road closures.<br />

Preventing a spill across SH2 requires that the full design flood would need to be conveyed in the <strong>Mangatawa</strong><br />

Drain. Given the tight corridor available between the Railway and SH2, this would require the drain to be either<br />

concrete lined, or at least to have full structural retaining walls both sides over most of its length. This is<br />

unlikely to gain consent because of the adverse aesthetic and environmental effects it would have on the<br />

<strong>water</strong>way and discharge point and is not viable because of the significant cost.<br />

It has there<strong>for</strong>e been concluded that the best approach is the balanced spill option whereby the frequency and<br />

volume of spills is reduced allowing the character of the existing <strong>Mangatawa</strong> Drain to be retained, combined<br />

with improving its flow capacity with some specific works and improved ongoing maintenance. This will<br />

reduce the risk of flooding across the SH2 and reduce the risk to Papamoa urban area to acceptable levels.<br />

There are a number of outcomes that the project seeks to achieve in respect of the proposed <strong>Mangatawa</strong> Drain<br />

improvements.<br />

(a) Reduced frequency and volume of flooding across the highway to the north;<br />

(b) An overflow volume discharged to the Wairakei <strong>catchment</strong> that is no more than was assumed <strong>for</strong> the TCC<br />

comprehensive <strong>storm</strong><strong>water</strong> consent <strong>for</strong> that <strong>catchment</strong>;<br />

Status: Final Page 63 April 2009<br />

Project Number: 3932036<br />

NZ1-1552092-<strong>Mangatawa</strong> Drain Flood Bypass and TEM Storm<strong>water</strong> AEE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!