The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
78 Mayor of <strong>London</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong><br />
from less traffic noise. Achieving direct routes away from busy traffic has<br />
been difficult in <strong>London</strong>. Kerbside cycle paths help to separate<br />
pedestrians from traffic.<br />
proposal 8 Transport for <strong>London</strong> will, and boroughs should, wherever practicable and<br />
cost-effective and having regard to other needs including increased public<br />
transport and road safety, take opportunities to improve noise<br />
environments from:<br />
■<br />
Optimising traffic calming measures, such as reviewing design and<br />
location of traffic humps;<br />
■ Design and management of Streets-for-People areas (Proposal 4G.10<br />
of Transport <strong>Strategy</strong>), including considering public access to quiet<br />
outside space, and extending Controlled Parking Zones; and<br />
■ Improving conditions for walkers and cyclists across the city.<br />
Central <strong>London</strong> Congestion Charging<br />
4A.42 Following extensive consultation, the Mayor announced on 26 February<br />
2002 his decision to proceed with Central <strong>London</strong> Congestion Charging.<br />
This involves a £5 charge to drive or park within the Congestion Charging<br />
Zone on weekdays between 0700 and 1830 hours. It was introduced in<br />
February 2003. Environmental effects, including noise, are being<br />
monitored alongside transport, economic and other issues.<br />
4A.43 Central <strong>London</strong> Congestion Charging was not expected in itself to have<br />
significant environmental effects, either positive or negative, inside or<br />
outside the charging zone. It should increase the scope for noise reductions<br />
in some areas while not having significant disbenefits elsewhere. <strong>The</strong> World<br />
Squares for All project, which includes pedestrianising the north side of<br />
Trafalgar Square, gives a marked improvement in the soundscape of one of<br />
<strong>London</strong>’s most prominent public spaces. Reductions in traffic levels in<br />
central <strong>London</strong> could offer opportunities for other initiatives which could<br />
support <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong>. In terms of the direct effects of<br />
Congestion Charging in general, however, changes in noise are likely to be<br />
small, both within the charging zone, and near its boundary, taking account<br />
of traffic management measures introduced either beforehand or based on<br />
experience following implementation.<br />
4A.44 Monitoring of Congestion Charging indicates that it has contributed to<br />
traffic conditions being more free flowing. A survey of about 8,000 people<br />
‘on street’ at shopping and tourist locations and other public spaces in and<br />
immediately around the charging zone suggests an overall popular<br />
perception that the noise environment has improved. 18 Additional bus<br />
priority measures complement the Congestion Charge. <strong>The</strong>se will improve<br />
bus operation and smoother bus driving will be possible. This will assist in