28.12.2014 Views

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

44 Mayor of <strong>London</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong><br />

Box 16: Some key spatial elements<br />

■ <strong>The</strong> <strong>London</strong> Plan expects higher density development to meet growing<br />

demand for homes and jobs. Densities are expected to rise in areas of<br />

greatest demand, where capacity exists and where there are no<br />

significant constraints.<br />

■ <strong>The</strong> most extensive areas of development capacity identified in the<br />

<strong>London</strong> Plan fall within four broad corridors running east, west, north<br />

and south through and out of <strong>London</strong>. Development opportunities in<br />

these regional corridors, where the <strong>London</strong> Plan stresses the importance<br />

of mixed-use, relate closely, in many cases, to transport facilities.<br />

■ <strong>The</strong> spatial geography of noise in <strong>London</strong> is diverse. Where more<br />

development is expected, as in the regeneration corridors of the<br />

Lee Valley and Thames Gateway, and around major new interchanges,<br />

well-designed development offers major opportunities to<br />

improve soundscapes.<br />

■ <strong>The</strong> <strong>London</strong> Plan proposes a Blue Ribbon Network in which public<br />

access to and more use of the Thames and other waterways is<br />

encouraged, and in which water space is planned from the water<br />

outwards. Enhancing soundscapes in sensitive locations need not stifle<br />

working waterways or rivers.<br />

■ <strong>The</strong> <strong>London</strong> Plan states that the boroughs should in their UDPs<br />

include policies to minimise the adverse impacts of noise, in terms of<br />

the location, design and operation of development, and should<br />

promote sustainable design and construction. <strong>The</strong>y should also, where<br />

necessary, include measures to contain noise from late night drinking<br />

and entertainment and other 24 hour activities, and, where<br />

appropriate, promote well-managed designated locations.<br />

Air Quality <strong>Strategy</strong><br />

3.39 <strong>The</strong>re are strong links between noise and air quality, with obvious<br />

overlaps in objectives and policies. Both noise and air pollutants come<br />

mainly from the same sources. Reducing traffic volumes, encouraging<br />

smoother traffic flows, and using vehicles running on alternative fuels<br />

such as compressed natural gas or hydrogen, which are often cleaner and<br />

quieter, can both reduce noise and improve air quality. However, there are<br />

some tensions. 24 For example, the optimum traffic speeds for minimising<br />

air pollutant emissions are not the same as those for minimising traffic<br />

noise. Continuous building frontages can screen noise, but narrow, highsided<br />

‘urban street canyons’ (see glossary) can hinder dispersion of<br />

polluted air. Such tensions will need to be resolved at action plan and<br />

operational levels, and other factors, such as safety or feasibility, will also<br />

influence decisions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!