28.12.2014 Views

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> Mayor of <strong>London</strong> 127<br />

the west (the predominant mode of operation at Heathrow) the<br />

glideslope may extend across <strong>London</strong> as far as Greenwich.<br />

4C.19 Much of the noise produced during descent to landing is aerodynamic,<br />

including from flaps and undercarriage. An ANMAC study (see glossary)<br />

concluded that specific measured arrivals noise limits were not practicable.<br />

Regular monitoring and reporting of approach noise and close working<br />

between the airport operator, airlines and air traffic control are all<br />

necessary to achieve improvements. Continuous Descent Approach (CDA)<br />

is a noise abatement technique for arriving aircraft which avoids the higher<br />

noise levels generated when aircraft descend in steps (see glossary). At<br />

Heathrow, CDA achievement during the 2300 to 0600 period improved<br />

from 73% in the second quarter of 1999 to 88% in the third quarter of<br />

2001. <strong>The</strong> airport operator has a target to increase this to 90% of arrivals<br />

by December 2004. 18 A Code of Practice has been developed to reduce<br />

noise from each aircraft arrival. 19 Low engine power settings during CDA<br />

reduce fuel use, and the aircraft is generally higher than in a stepped<br />

approach. Much of the noise is from the turbofan assembly and is tonal in<br />

quality. People tend to find tonal noise more annoying at a given level.<br />

4C.20 Future changes to international air traffic management include integrated<br />

‘gate to gate’ operational systems, and ‘area navigation’ procedures<br />

(RNAV, see glossary), with the prospect of adjustments to the present<br />

structure of departure routes. Reducing the need for entering one of the<br />

four ‘holding stacks’ around <strong>London</strong>, would not necessarily reduce the<br />

need for integrating different traffic streams for final approach. Airspace<br />

management is the responsibility of the Civil Aviation <strong>Authority</strong>/National<br />

Air Traffic Services. Air traffic controllers use a variety of rules, procedures<br />

and practices designed to ensure the safe and expeditious separation and<br />

sequencing of aircraft. <strong>The</strong> structure of controlled airspace over <strong>London</strong><br />

has been built up over a long period. Any major redesign would have<br />

widespread ‘knock on’ implications. Aircraft positioning for approach to<br />

Heathrow are not necessarily required to enter a holding pattern, or be<br />

constrained to a particular standard arrival route. Aircraft may, depending<br />

on air traffic conditions, weather conditions and other factors, be directed<br />

and sequenced to final approach in a variety of ways.<br />

4C.21 Aircraft manoeuvre over many parts of <strong>London</strong>, outside the most-affected<br />

areas in south-west <strong>London</strong>. Many of these are manoeuvring across south<br />

or north <strong>London</strong> to join the glideslope on their approach to Heathrow<br />

Airport. <strong>The</strong>re are also increasing movements to and from other airports in<br />

and around <strong>London</strong>. It may not always be clear to people in Tower<br />

Hamlets or Greenwich, for example, whether the aircraft they see are<br />

using Heathrow, <strong>London</strong> City or other airports. Air traffic control

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!