28.12.2014 Views

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> Mayor of <strong>London</strong> 123<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a wide variation in individual response to aircraft noise. <strong>The</strong> noise<br />

index on which the 57 L Aeq<br />

contour is based was derived at a time when the<br />

number of aircraft movements was much lower than today 11 . A three year<br />

study was announced by the Aviation Minister on 8 May 2001 12 . <strong>The</strong> study<br />

is expected to cover the relationship between noise levels and annoyance,<br />

attitudes to sleep disturbance at night, and values placed on lower noise<br />

levels relative to other environmental factors. It is important that research<br />

encompasses the difficulties people have getting to sleep or getting back to<br />

sleep once woken, as well as actually being woken once asleep. It is unlikely<br />

that a single noise index will be suitable for all policy purposes.<br />

Requirements of the Environmental <strong>Noise</strong> Directive 2002/49/EC include<br />

use of the L den<br />

and L night<br />

indicators (see glossary) averaged over the whole<br />

year. Other indices may be used on a supplementary basis. Night noise<br />

contours have not previously been produced as a standard practice for<br />

Heathrow. L night<br />

contours are likely to provide useful addition information.<br />

Other information, such as number of events along the glidepaths, at<br />

different times, is also likely to be needed (see ‘Public information and<br />

communication’ below). Changes in the way noise is quantified do not, of<br />

course, reduce it. However, ensuring that any noise index reflects adverse<br />

effects on people as accurately as possible must be an essential part of<br />

good decision making.<br />

4C.10 <strong>Noise</strong> from jet aircraft engines was significantly reduced with the<br />

introduction of high-bypass turbofan designs. <strong>The</strong> need for noise<br />

reduction around airports is expected to influence aircraft design further,<br />

although there can be tensions with other environmental objectives, such<br />

as minimising fuel use. Civil aircraft are required to hold a noise certificate<br />

containing noise values related to certain test conditions. <strong>Noise</strong> standards<br />

for aircraft are agreed internationally through the International Civil<br />

Aviation Organisation (ICAO). 13 Some older low by-pass engined aircraft,<br />

fitted with ‘hushkits’ to enable them to meet ‘Chapter 3’ standards (see<br />

glossary) remain, but are a small minority of the fleet. 14 At Heathrow,<br />

nearly all movements are by Chapter 3 aircraft.<br />

4C.11 After the 2002 Chapter 2 phase-out, there is no immediate prospect of a<br />

technological advance giving a similar reduction to that achieved through<br />

introduction of high by-pass engines. 15 <strong>The</strong> 2001 ICAO decision on a new<br />

Chapter 4 aircraft noise standard did not secure the degree of<br />

improvement many had pressed for. European negotiators seeking quieter<br />

aircraft at ICAO were outvoted by those from other parts of the world<br />

whose priority was cheaper aircraft. <strong>The</strong> ICAO decision effectively pushes<br />

the onus onto regulators, airport operators and land use planners in<br />

countries where noise sensitive airports are located.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!