The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> Mayor of <strong>London</strong> 123<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is a wide variation in individual response to aircraft noise. <strong>The</strong> noise<br />
index on which the 57 L Aeq<br />
contour is based was derived at a time when the<br />
number of aircraft movements was much lower than today 11 . A three year<br />
study was announced by the Aviation Minister on 8 May 2001 12 . <strong>The</strong> study<br />
is expected to cover the relationship between noise levels and annoyance,<br />
attitudes to sleep disturbance at night, and values placed on lower noise<br />
levels relative to other environmental factors. It is important that research<br />
encompasses the difficulties people have getting to sleep or getting back to<br />
sleep once woken, as well as actually being woken once asleep. It is unlikely<br />
that a single noise index will be suitable for all policy purposes.<br />
Requirements of the Environmental <strong>Noise</strong> Directive 2002/49/EC include<br />
use of the L den<br />
and L night<br />
indicators (see glossary) averaged over the whole<br />
year. Other indices may be used on a supplementary basis. Night noise<br />
contours have not previously been produced as a standard practice for<br />
Heathrow. L night<br />
contours are likely to provide useful addition information.<br />
Other information, such as number of events along the glidepaths, at<br />
different times, is also likely to be needed (see ‘Public information and<br />
communication’ below). Changes in the way noise is quantified do not, of<br />
course, reduce it. However, ensuring that any noise index reflects adverse<br />
effects on people as accurately as possible must be an essential part of<br />
good decision making.<br />
4C.10 <strong>Noise</strong> from jet aircraft engines was significantly reduced with the<br />
introduction of high-bypass turbofan designs. <strong>The</strong> need for noise<br />
reduction around airports is expected to influence aircraft design further,<br />
although there can be tensions with other environmental objectives, such<br />
as minimising fuel use. Civil aircraft are required to hold a noise certificate<br />
containing noise values related to certain test conditions. <strong>Noise</strong> standards<br />
for aircraft are agreed internationally through the International Civil<br />
Aviation Organisation (ICAO). 13 Some older low by-pass engined aircraft,<br />
fitted with ‘hushkits’ to enable them to meet ‘Chapter 3’ standards (see<br />
glossary) remain, but are a small minority of the fleet. 14 At Heathrow,<br />
nearly all movements are by Chapter 3 aircraft.<br />
4C.11 After the 2002 Chapter 2 phase-out, there is no immediate prospect of a<br />
technological advance giving a similar reduction to that achieved through<br />
introduction of high by-pass engines. 15 <strong>The</strong> 2001 ICAO decision on a new<br />
Chapter 4 aircraft noise standard did not secure the degree of<br />
improvement many had pressed for. European negotiators seeking quieter<br />
aircraft at ICAO were outvoted by those from other parts of the world<br />
whose priority was cheaper aircraft. <strong>The</strong> ICAO decision effectively pushes<br />
the onus onto regulators, airport operators and land use planners in<br />
countries where noise sensitive airports are located.