The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> Mayor of <strong>London</strong> 161<br />
4E.6 Local Authorities are consulted on all IPPC permit applications, and the<br />
Environment Agency attaches particular weight to their response when<br />
determining BAT for noise at a given installation. According to the<br />
Government’s ‘Practical Guide’ on IPPC, 8<br />
“<strong>The</strong> Agency shall justify the<br />
occasions when it does not follow any Local <strong>Authority</strong> noise proposals”.<br />
<strong>The</strong> emphasis is on control of noise at source and a risk-based approach<br />
to the regulation of noise under IPPC is outlined in the Agency guidance.<br />
Where noise is not a problem and good practice is being observed, it is<br />
unlikely that permits will include any specific conditions relating to noise<br />
other than a general requirement to use BAT. However where noise is<br />
likely to be a problem, the permit conditions are likely to be influenced by<br />
relevant planning conditions and previous enforcement history. An<br />
operator may be required to prepare a noise management plan where the<br />
degree of noise risk justifies its use. Any monitoring required will be<br />
expected to be carried out according to relevant British Standards or other<br />
guidance. Permitted noise levels will depend on local circumstances. In<br />
theory, different environmental objectives may be traded off against each<br />
other to achieve best overall environmental protection. In practice, this is<br />
not expected to result in any reduction in standards as regards noise.<br />
4E.7 <strong>The</strong> Mayor’s Municipal Waste Management <strong>Strategy</strong> and Green<br />
Procurement Code envisage large increases in waste recycling. Major<br />
changes to <strong>London</strong>’s materials economy are implied, with a growth in local<br />
and regional ‘remanufacturing’ from materials which would previously<br />
have been exported as waste. Planning Policy Guidance Note 10, 9<br />
includes advice on how the land-use planning system can contribute to<br />
sustainable waste management by providing the required facilities. <strong>The</strong><br />
image and public acceptability of many parts of the waste management<br />
industry need to be improved. <strong>Noise</strong> from waste vehicles is considered in<br />
Chapter 4A (paragraphs 4A.51 and 52, and Policy 14).<br />
4E.8 <strong>The</strong> Waste Management Licensing Regulations 1994 require the<br />
avoidance of nuisance through noise arising from the recovery or disposal<br />
of waste. This requirement applies to activities subject to the waste<br />
management licensing system, and those processes dealing with waste<br />
which fall under IPPC. <strong>The</strong> Environment Agency works closely with<br />
boroughs at early stages in the licensing and planning processes to ensure<br />
that responsibilities for dealing with noise from waste sites are clear. <strong>The</strong><br />
Agency’s ‘Guidance for the Regulation of <strong>Noise</strong> at Waste Management<br />
Facilities’, version 3 was published by the Environment Agency in July<br />
2002. It proposes that its inspectors will consider the impact of noise on<br />
the surrounding environment as part of routine site inspections, and that<br />
the Agency should set conditions in waste management licenses to<br />
include, where appropriate, conditions to control noise.