The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> Mayor of <strong>London</strong> 109<br />
Standards related to PPP to be altered could have significant cost<br />
implications. Transport for <strong>London</strong> will need to develop its ‘client side’<br />
capabilities in noise and vibration in order to quantify the benefits of<br />
noise control in ‘business case’ terms, and to negotiate and secure costeffective<br />
measures through the complexities of inherited PPP<br />
arrangements. Exemplary noise and vibration management could require<br />
additional resources. This may need to be the subject of specific<br />
negotiation with Government, related to development of relevant national<br />
noise and rail policies and statutory requirements.<br />
4B.25 Having regard to the needs of <strong>London</strong>’s night time economy and cultural<br />
and entertainment sectors, the Mayor’s Transport <strong>Strategy</strong> (paragraph<br />
4C.7) calls for exploration of the costs and benefits of extending the<br />
operating hours of the Underground, particularly at weekends, taking<br />
account of the requirements of night time maintenance. Wherever<br />
possible, infrastructure, including ancillary plant and equipment, such as<br />
ventilation ducts, needs to be brought up to best modern practice before<br />
significant extensions in operations. Improved understanding of the costs<br />
and benefits of reducing noise and vibration, in the context of evolving<br />
funding arrangements, is needed for priority setting. <strong>The</strong> work proposed<br />
in consultation on a National <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> 5 will be useful. It is<br />
important that conditions are improved cost-effectively, to maintain fair<br />
treatment of rail in relation to other transport modes.<br />
policy 25<br />
policy 26<br />
policy 27<br />
<strong>The</strong> Mayor will expect Transport for <strong>London</strong> to develop cost-effective<br />
plans, as far as Public Private Partnership and resource constraints allow,<br />
to minimise noise and vibration through improvements in the design,<br />
operation, monitoring and maintenance of transport infrastructure, while<br />
seeking improved <strong>London</strong> Underground services in pursuit of <strong>London</strong>’s<br />
transport, regeneration and sustainable development needs.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Mayor will expect Transport for <strong>London</strong> to develop its technical<br />
monitoring, assessment, specifying and commissioning capabilities in<br />
noise and vibration related to securing cost-effective improvements in<br />
performance through Public Private Partnership and other contract<br />
arrangements. This includes developing methods of quantifying the<br />
benefits of noise and vibration reduction, and taking account of resident<br />
and other complaints in assessing the need for remedial treatment.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Mayor will expect Transport for <strong>London</strong> to assess, on a scheme-byscheme<br />
basis, the implications of service improvements which could have<br />
significant impacts on noise and vibration, and incorporate cost-effective<br />
mitigation measures where appropriate.