28.12.2014 Views

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

112 Mayor of <strong>London</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong><br />

environmental benefits. It is nevertheless important that the best<br />

available techniques and operating practices are employed to minimise<br />

the risks of disturbance. Construction noise issues should be addressed at<br />

programme and project planning stage, and measures agreed with local<br />

authorities and others. Local authorities and scheme promoters are<br />

increasingly seeking to harmonise Codes of Construction Practice.<br />

Responsible authorities and contractors should apply good practice. This<br />

implies prior discussions with the local authority and, in most cases,<br />

application for prior consent under Section 61 of CoPA. It implies<br />

adherence to BS 5228, some sections of which are Codes of Practice<br />

under CoPA. Good practice in implementing major construction and<br />

maintenance works with significant noise implications is likely to include<br />

advance letters to neighbouring occupants, 24 hour helplines where<br />

necessary, rapid response to complaints, and regular publication of<br />

information on the types of complaints.<br />

policy 31<br />

<strong>The</strong> Mayor will urge the Strategic Rail <strong>Authority</strong> and the rail industry, and<br />

will expect Transport for <strong>London</strong>, to secure good practice in minimising<br />

noise and vibration where railway construction and maintenance are<br />

carried out.<br />

<strong>Noise</strong> mapping of railways in <strong>London</strong><br />

4B.31 <strong>The</strong> UK Government published its consultation paper on a National<br />

<strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> in December 2001, which included mapping the<br />

main sources and areas of noise by 2004. It is important that noise<br />

mapping should be used not just to quantify noise exposure in general<br />

terms, but to play a part in optimising some of the key actions affecting<br />

noise generation. Local authorities have typically found it difficult to<br />

obtain accurate information of the type required for noise mapping from<br />

the railway industry. Giving specific parts of the railway industry<br />

responsibility for producing source noise mapping to defined protocols,<br />

and making this available to local authorities and others, is likely to be<br />

more cost-effective than many local authorities mapping ‘their’ parts of a<br />

much wider network. It should also assist the railway industry in moving<br />

towards integrating noise management in system management. A specific<br />

concern over the current UK railway noise prediction model is that it does<br />

not cover the effects of railhead roughness, including corrugation. This<br />

has been recognised by Government and rail industry advisors. Research is<br />

being carried out to enable such effects to be included in modelling for<br />

mapping purposes.<br />

policy 32<br />

<strong>The</strong> Mayor will urge the Strategic Rail <strong>Authority</strong> and the rail industry, and<br />

will expectTransport for <strong>London</strong>, to work with the Government, its<br />

consultants, <strong>London</strong> boroughs and other stakeholders to ensure that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!