The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
112 Mayor of <strong>London</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong><br />
environmental benefits. It is nevertheless important that the best<br />
available techniques and operating practices are employed to minimise<br />
the risks of disturbance. Construction noise issues should be addressed at<br />
programme and project planning stage, and measures agreed with local<br />
authorities and others. Local authorities and scheme promoters are<br />
increasingly seeking to harmonise Codes of Construction Practice.<br />
Responsible authorities and contractors should apply good practice. This<br />
implies prior discussions with the local authority and, in most cases,<br />
application for prior consent under Section 61 of CoPA. It implies<br />
adherence to BS 5228, some sections of which are Codes of Practice<br />
under CoPA. Good practice in implementing major construction and<br />
maintenance works with significant noise implications is likely to include<br />
advance letters to neighbouring occupants, 24 hour helplines where<br />
necessary, rapid response to complaints, and regular publication of<br />
information on the types of complaints.<br />
policy 31<br />
<strong>The</strong> Mayor will urge the Strategic Rail <strong>Authority</strong> and the rail industry, and<br />
will expect Transport for <strong>London</strong>, to secure good practice in minimising<br />
noise and vibration where railway construction and maintenance are<br />
carried out.<br />
<strong>Noise</strong> mapping of railways in <strong>London</strong><br />
4B.31 <strong>The</strong> UK Government published its consultation paper on a National<br />
<strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> in December 2001, which included mapping the<br />
main sources and areas of noise by 2004. It is important that noise<br />
mapping should be used not just to quantify noise exposure in general<br />
terms, but to play a part in optimising some of the key actions affecting<br />
noise generation. Local authorities have typically found it difficult to<br />
obtain accurate information of the type required for noise mapping from<br />
the railway industry. Giving specific parts of the railway industry<br />
responsibility for producing source noise mapping to defined protocols,<br />
and making this available to local authorities and others, is likely to be<br />
more cost-effective than many local authorities mapping ‘their’ parts of a<br />
much wider network. It should also assist the railway industry in moving<br />
towards integrating noise management in system management. A specific<br />
concern over the current UK railway noise prediction model is that it does<br />
not cover the effects of railhead roughness, including corrugation. This<br />
has been recognised by Government and rail industry advisors. Research is<br />
being carried out to enable such effects to be included in modelling for<br />
mapping purposes.<br />
policy 32<br />
<strong>The</strong> Mayor will urge the Strategic Rail <strong>Authority</strong> and the rail industry, and<br />
will expectTransport for <strong>London</strong>, to work with the Government, its<br />
consultants, <strong>London</strong> boroughs and other stakeholders to ensure that