28.12.2014 Views

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

104 Mayor of <strong>London</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong><br />

especially at night. Otherwise, acceleration and deceleration rates should<br />

be minimised. Heavy diesel engines should not be kept idling, emitting<br />

low frequency noise which people can find particularly annoying. Network<br />

Rail has an agreement with the largest rail freight operating company,<br />

EWS, that signallers will inform drivers if they will be waiting for more<br />

than 15 minutes, so that the driver can shut down the locomotive. <strong>The</strong><br />

signaller informs the driver 5 minutes before a green signal. A similar<br />

approach is sought in stations, but powers are not available to enforce the<br />

practice in either case. Railway horns and other warning devices can<br />

disturb or startle waiting passengers and those living close to railways.<br />

Alternative ways of achieving safety objectives should be periodically<br />

reviewed by the railway industry. Where audible signals are unavoidable,<br />

ways of reducing adverse impacts, such as using broadband sound, or<br />

otherwise improving sound quality, should be considered.<br />

policy 20<br />

<strong>The</strong> Mayor will urge the Strategic Rail <strong>Authority</strong> and the rail industry to<br />

promote the cost-effective development and adoption of quieter railway<br />

vehicle technologies and management systems. Railway operating<br />

practices which minimise noise, particularly at night, should be promoted<br />

and ‘no idling’ policies observed.<br />

Railway structures and noise barriers<br />

4B.15 Vibration of steel bridges and other structures can radiate noise. This can<br />

be complex and expensive to reduce, but options should be examined<br />

when structures, particularly long spans, are being refurbished or<br />

replaced. Many bridges and viaducts incorporate a parapet which may act<br />

as a noise barrier, screening wheel-rail noise for buildings of moderate<br />

height. <strong>Noise</strong> barriers can be structurally difficult to achieve on viaducts<br />

at low cost. Parapets can also re-radiate sound resulting from vibration in<br />

the bridge structure, negating the shielding effect of the parapet. It may<br />

require comprehensive isolation of the track from the viaduct to avoid<br />

this, although this could only be done as a part of a major track<br />

replacement programme. Options to improve parapet screening could be<br />

most cost-effective where replacement, or other major works occur.<br />

4B.16 Railway cuttings can screen noise, although they are less effective for low<br />

frequency noise. <strong>Noise</strong> from cuttings can be reduced by using absorptive<br />

surfaces on vertical retaining walls, and inside the mouths of tunnels,<br />

where clearances allow. In ‘natural’ cuttings, sloping rough ground can<br />

attenuate sound. Dense vegetation may assist if the width is several<br />

metres. Barriers close to tracks are most effective, but are subject to<br />

safety and other operational constraints. Well-placed, well-designed<br />

barriers can reduce rolling noise by over 10 dB. <strong>The</strong>y are less effective<br />

against diesel locomotives on power, where the main source of the noise

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!