The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
104 Mayor of <strong>London</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong><br />
especially at night. Otherwise, acceleration and deceleration rates should<br />
be minimised. Heavy diesel engines should not be kept idling, emitting<br />
low frequency noise which people can find particularly annoying. Network<br />
Rail has an agreement with the largest rail freight operating company,<br />
EWS, that signallers will inform drivers if they will be waiting for more<br />
than 15 minutes, so that the driver can shut down the locomotive. <strong>The</strong><br />
signaller informs the driver 5 minutes before a green signal. A similar<br />
approach is sought in stations, but powers are not available to enforce the<br />
practice in either case. Railway horns and other warning devices can<br />
disturb or startle waiting passengers and those living close to railways.<br />
Alternative ways of achieving safety objectives should be periodically<br />
reviewed by the railway industry. Where audible signals are unavoidable,<br />
ways of reducing adverse impacts, such as using broadband sound, or<br />
otherwise improving sound quality, should be considered.<br />
policy 20<br />
<strong>The</strong> Mayor will urge the Strategic Rail <strong>Authority</strong> and the rail industry to<br />
promote the cost-effective development and adoption of quieter railway<br />
vehicle technologies and management systems. Railway operating<br />
practices which minimise noise, particularly at night, should be promoted<br />
and ‘no idling’ policies observed.<br />
Railway structures and noise barriers<br />
4B.15 Vibration of steel bridges and other structures can radiate noise. This can<br />
be complex and expensive to reduce, but options should be examined<br />
when structures, particularly long spans, are being refurbished or<br />
replaced. Many bridges and viaducts incorporate a parapet which may act<br />
as a noise barrier, screening wheel-rail noise for buildings of moderate<br />
height. <strong>Noise</strong> barriers can be structurally difficult to achieve on viaducts<br />
at low cost. Parapets can also re-radiate sound resulting from vibration in<br />
the bridge structure, negating the shielding effect of the parapet. It may<br />
require comprehensive isolation of the track from the viaduct to avoid<br />
this, although this could only be done as a part of a major track<br />
replacement programme. Options to improve parapet screening could be<br />
most cost-effective where replacement, or other major works occur.<br />
4B.16 Railway cuttings can screen noise, although they are less effective for low<br />
frequency noise. <strong>Noise</strong> from cuttings can be reduced by using absorptive<br />
surfaces on vertical retaining walls, and inside the mouths of tunnels,<br />
where clearances allow. In ‘natural’ cuttings, sloping rough ground can<br />
attenuate sound. Dense vegetation may assist if the width is several<br />
metres. Barriers close to tracks are most effective, but are subject to<br />
safety and other operational constraints. Well-placed, well-designed<br />
barriers can reduce rolling noise by over 10 dB. <strong>The</strong>y are less effective<br />
against diesel locomotives on power, where the main source of the noise