28.12.2014 Views

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

138 Mayor of <strong>London</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong><br />

staff have immediate access to noise and track keeping data, which can<br />

identify specific noise events. Relevant data should be made readily<br />

available to those with a valid interest or concern, subject only to practical<br />

and security considerations. Some local authorities provide a service for<br />

local aircraft noise complaints, in addition to their general noise nuisance<br />

services. <strong>The</strong> patterns of complaints are regularly scrutinised through the<br />

airport consultative committees.<br />

4C.41 One of the problems with the published L Aeq 16 hour<br />

aircraft noise contours is<br />

that they are being used for purposes for which they are not suitable. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

reduce a complex series of events to a single figure, which is useful for<br />

planning, summary trends and other purposes. However, despite published<br />

caveats, people can interpret the 57 contour as implying that people<br />

outside it should not notice aircraft at all. In fact, a proportion of people<br />

are annoyed at lower levels of aircraft noise. <strong>The</strong> contours only give a<br />

generalised long term indication of overall noise energy. Particularly when<br />

they are choosing where to live, people may want to know how many<br />

aircraft are likely to fly over, and at what times, including whether there<br />

are regular periods of respite. In the case of roads, railways and many other<br />

noise sources, the physical presence of infrastructure in the vicinity of a<br />

house may alert a buyer, while aircraft may not be using a relevant<br />

flightpath when buyers inspect. Better information on the probability of<br />

overflight could also be useful when people are visiting historic parks or<br />

gardens, nature reserves, or making other plans for open air activity.<br />

4C.42 <strong>The</strong>re are likely to be advantages in providing more information about<br />

aircraft noise in everyday language, such as where flightpaths normally are,<br />

and numbers of aircraft during particular times of the day. Radar plots can<br />

indicate where aircraft flightpaths are concentrated. However, they do not<br />

indicate how audible aircraft are likely to be in a given location. Also, the<br />

time of day in which people are most interested may vary depending on<br />

their activity patterns. <strong>The</strong> Australian Government has published papers<br />

assessing alternative forms of information. 37 <strong>The</strong> information people want<br />

may be simple, but analysing and presenting it in fully customised ways,<br />

such as through interactive websites may require considerable resources.<br />

What information people would find most useful, for what purposes, and<br />

through what delivery channels, needs to be examined.<br />

policy 48<br />

<strong>The</strong> Mayor will urge the Government to examine how people use different<br />

types of aircraft noise information for different purposes, and how<br />

relevant data, such as on flightpaths, can be made readily available,<br />

subject to practical and security considerations. A study should assess<br />

what forms of communication would be more transparent and inclusive,<br />

and what arrangements for preparation, publication and independent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!