The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
138 Mayor of <strong>London</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong><br />
staff have immediate access to noise and track keeping data, which can<br />
identify specific noise events. Relevant data should be made readily<br />
available to those with a valid interest or concern, subject only to practical<br />
and security considerations. Some local authorities provide a service for<br />
local aircraft noise complaints, in addition to their general noise nuisance<br />
services. <strong>The</strong> patterns of complaints are regularly scrutinised through the<br />
airport consultative committees.<br />
4C.41 One of the problems with the published L Aeq 16 hour<br />
aircraft noise contours is<br />
that they are being used for purposes for which they are not suitable. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
reduce a complex series of events to a single figure, which is useful for<br />
planning, summary trends and other purposes. However, despite published<br />
caveats, people can interpret the 57 contour as implying that people<br />
outside it should not notice aircraft at all. In fact, a proportion of people<br />
are annoyed at lower levels of aircraft noise. <strong>The</strong> contours only give a<br />
generalised long term indication of overall noise energy. Particularly when<br />
they are choosing where to live, people may want to know how many<br />
aircraft are likely to fly over, and at what times, including whether there<br />
are regular periods of respite. In the case of roads, railways and many other<br />
noise sources, the physical presence of infrastructure in the vicinity of a<br />
house may alert a buyer, while aircraft may not be using a relevant<br />
flightpath when buyers inspect. Better information on the probability of<br />
overflight could also be useful when people are visiting historic parks or<br />
gardens, nature reserves, or making other plans for open air activity.<br />
4C.42 <strong>The</strong>re are likely to be advantages in providing more information about<br />
aircraft noise in everyday language, such as where flightpaths normally are,<br />
and numbers of aircraft during particular times of the day. Radar plots can<br />
indicate where aircraft flightpaths are concentrated. However, they do not<br />
indicate how audible aircraft are likely to be in a given location. Also, the<br />
time of day in which people are most interested may vary depending on<br />
their activity patterns. <strong>The</strong> Australian Government has published papers<br />
assessing alternative forms of information. 37 <strong>The</strong> information people want<br />
may be simple, but analysing and presenting it in fully customised ways,<br />
such as through interactive websites may require considerable resources.<br />
What information people would find most useful, for what purposes, and<br />
through what delivery channels, needs to be examined.<br />
policy 48<br />
<strong>The</strong> Mayor will urge the Government to examine how people use different<br />
types of aircraft noise information for different purposes, and how<br />
relevant data, such as on flightpaths, can be made readily available,<br />
subject to practical and security considerations. A study should assess<br />
what forms of communication would be more transparent and inclusive,<br />
and what arrangements for preparation, publication and independent