The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> Mayor of <strong>London</strong> 71<br />
is now quieter tyre-road combinations. Tyre-road noise is typically<br />
dominant at speeds above 60 kilometres per hour (40 miles per hour), but<br />
is becoming more significant at lower speeds, down to 50 kph (30 mph)<br />
or even lower. Tyres on many cars have become wider as they have<br />
become heavier. Porous asphalt is especially well-suited to reducing noise<br />
on faster roads, especially motorways. Other noise-reducing surfaces may<br />
be more suitable for highly urban situations. Some of the new ‘thin’<br />
surfacings may reduce noise even at lower speeds. Stone mastic asphalt<br />
(SMA) is a particularly versatile material. Many such surfacings require<br />
less planing back and fewer other operations during resurfacing. <strong>The</strong>y use<br />
less material and avoid use of some of the noisier construction plant. This<br />
is a particular benefit for sensitive times and locations.<br />
4A.25 In deciding whether to use a noise-reducing surface, and which material<br />
to specify, changing traffic speed through the day needs to be taken into<br />
account. <strong>The</strong> choice of surface should take account of real vehicle speeds<br />
at night, in the evenings, and possibly at weekends, not just in congested<br />
weekday conditions. In assessing the noise benefits of different surfaces,<br />
account should be taken of changes in sound quality as well as in overall<br />
sound energy. Some surfaces reduce some sound frequencies (see<br />
Appendix A2 for explanation of acoustic terms) more than others, such<br />
that the sound quality becomes less annoying. A surface may give greater<br />
reductions when new than after several years of use. <strong>The</strong> life cycle<br />
performance of noise-reducing surfaces needs to be taken into account.<br />
Choice of materials for and design of footways, traffic islands and other<br />
spaces in addition to the vehicular carriageway needs to have regard to<br />
noise. For example, a smoothly-surfaced route should, if possible, be<br />
provided for trolleys where early or late loading and unloading takes place<br />
in mixed use areas.<br />
proposal 6 Transport for <strong>London</strong> will, and <strong>London</strong> boroughs and others should, use<br />
noise-reducing surfaces, where practicable and cost-effective, and where<br />
they do not compromise safety, particularly skidding resistance, and other<br />
criteria. This includes:<br />
■ Where possible, prioritising higher speed roads and roads with<br />
significant night traffic flows and speeds; and<br />
■ Assessing how the life cycle acoustic performance of noise-reducing<br />
surfaces may best be monitored and findings shared.<br />
Tree planting, noise barriers, landform and highway structures<br />
4A.26 Reducing noise at source will generally be the first priority, especially in<br />
cities. Some form of screening is often seen as the next line of defence -<br />
such as noise barriers, mounding or other changes to landform alongside<br />
the road. Tree planting needs to be dense, and extend over a belt of