The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> Mayor of <strong>London</strong> 105<br />
is higher. Ideally, vehicle skirts and low, close barriers should be designed<br />
together, though this is difficult on existing or multi-user railways.<br />
Railway barriers need to have absorptive inner surfaces or have surfaces at<br />
an angle to the vertical in order to avoid multiple reflection of sound<br />
between the barrier and the side of the train.<br />
Box 36: Solar power from noise barriers<br />
A recent study of renewable energy potential in <strong>London</strong> 3 drew attention<br />
to the potential for generating electricity from photovoltaics (PV)<br />
integrated into noise barriers along suitable railway lines in <strong>London</strong>, as<br />
well as major roads (see paragraph 4A.29).<br />
4B.17 Railway noise barrier installation has been difficult to achieve in the UK.<br />
However, they have been introduced in some <strong>London</strong> Boroughs, Kent and<br />
Surrey to reduce noise from intensified freight traffic as a result of the<br />
opening of the Channel Tunnel. <strong>The</strong>y have also been used on the<br />
Docklands Light Railway and the Channel Tunnel Rail Link. Such barriers<br />
need to be designed to appropriate standards 4 and well maintained. Very<br />
high costs have typically been quoted for any works on railway<br />
operational land. <strong>The</strong> need to improve railway security against trespass<br />
and vandalism may provide opportunities, such as screening at ventilation<br />
ducts for underground sections. Purpose-designed combined noise<br />
barriers and secure boundary fences may be cost-effective.<br />
policy 21<br />
<strong>The</strong> Mayor will urge the Strategic Rail <strong>Authority</strong> and the rail industry, and<br />
will expect Transport for <strong>London</strong>, taking particular account of vandalism,<br />
visual amenity, historic building and conservation issues to:<br />
■ Examine the scope for promoting the safe and cost-effective use of<br />
railway noise barriers, where source-related measures would not be<br />
effective;<br />
■ Consider securing noise benefits from routine renewal or improvement<br />
of boundary walls/security fencing, including at ventilation ducts, and<br />
in refurbishment of structures, notably bridges;<br />
■ Investigate the potential for noise barrier-integrated photovoltaic<br />
power generation along suitable railway lines.<br />
Spatial planning and urban design<br />
4B.18 <strong>The</strong> need for more housing and other space in <strong>London</strong> provides<br />
opportunities to improve soundscapes by well-designed development<br />
alongside, and in some cases over, railways. Adequate isolation of such<br />
new buildings from railway generated noise and vibration needs, of<br />
course, to be achieved. Suitably self-protecting continuous or nearcontinuous<br />
development alongside railways can screen amenity spaces<br />
and buildings further from the railway and non noise-sensitive buildings