The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
114 Mayor of <strong>London</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong><br />
attainable with and without opening of carriage end-windows and other<br />
ventilation flaps or grilles, should be taken into account when<br />
commissioning new rolling stock or undertaking major refurbishment.<br />
Sound levels inside rail vehicles can be required to not exceed specified<br />
maximum permitted levels, measured in accordance with the requirements<br />
of ISO 3381. Cost can vary very widely depending on the nature of the<br />
railway vehicle and its operating environment, and decisions will need to<br />
be made on a project basis. Audible warning signals are required by the<br />
Rail Vehicle Accessibility Regulations. <strong>The</strong>y are required for safety reasons<br />
and can be particularly important for disabled people. In some situations,<br />
adaptive systems (see previous paragraph) can reduce annoyance (e.g.<br />
automatic train door warning alarms).<br />
policy 34<br />
<strong>The</strong> Mayor will urge the Strategic Rail <strong>Authority</strong>, the rail industry and<br />
other stakeholders, and will expect Transport for <strong>London</strong>, when assessing<br />
issues of service quality, to give consideration to monitoring noise levels<br />
experienced by passengers and/or public attitudes to interior noise.<br />
Rail freight<br />
4B.35 <strong>The</strong> Mayor’s Transport <strong>Strategy</strong> and <strong>London</strong> Plan support the transfer of<br />
freight from road to rail, where this is practical and in keeping with other<br />
objectives. More rail freight can contribute to environmental improvement<br />
on <strong>London</strong>’s streets by reducing the number of heavy lorries. This needs<br />
to be balanced against localised environmental disbenefits. Freight trains<br />
are typically much heavier than passenger trains, and can create more low<br />
frequency noise and vibration. Local effects vary. <strong>The</strong> noise and vibration<br />
implications of major schemes to achieve modal transfer will need to be<br />
assessed on a scheme-by-scheme basis. Assessment should include short<br />
term measurements (such as hourly values) and/or the number and level<br />
of individual noise events at night as well as long period ‘averaged’ noise,<br />
and should take account of low frequency noise and vibration.<br />
4B.36 Competition with passenger services for the limited amount of rail<br />
capacity nationally and within <strong>London</strong> increases the pressure for rail<br />
freight movements to take place at night, when background noise levels<br />
are lower. <strong>London</strong>’s rail network is often used for freight which does not<br />
have an origin or destination in <strong>London</strong>, and could be diverted round the<br />
city. This would help to minimise noise and vibration in <strong>London</strong>’s dense<br />
residential areas and release scarce rail capacity for freight with an origin<br />
or destination in <strong>London</strong> as well as passenger services. Multi-modal<br />
freight terminal proposals and expansion of existing terminals will require<br />
careful assessment of layout and screening, the routes used for access by<br />
road vehicles, the types of road vehicles used, hours of operation and