The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> Mayor of <strong>London</strong> 107<br />
policy 23<br />
<strong>The</strong> Mayor will urge boroughs to consider including, in their Unitary<br />
Development Plans, proposals to enhance the noise screening provided by<br />
development alongside railways, having regard to benefits for the wider<br />
area. <strong>Noise</strong> reduction in the wider neighbourhood should be taken into<br />
account as a benefit by local planning authorities in assessing design in<br />
applications for development alongside or over suitable railways. Decked<br />
or bridging development is most likely to be acceptable where railways are<br />
below adjacent ground levels.<br />
Building insulation<br />
4B.20 Current <strong>Noise</strong> Insulation Regulations for railways are based on the<br />
principle that noise from existing facilities is already known to local<br />
residents, and reflected in property values. New railways may not have<br />
been expected by existing property owners, who may be eligible for<br />
compensation (see Appendix A7). As with roads, the regulations do not<br />
apply where the use of existing lines is intensified. However, investment<br />
in better track and trains should mean that, in many cases, the noise<br />
generated by each train will be lower. <strong>The</strong> preparation of a National<br />
<strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> 5 provides the Government with the information<br />
and the opportunity for a review. Issues include whether the historic<br />
‘noise threshold’ and package of measures in the <strong>Noise</strong> Insulation<br />
Regulations are still relevant. A more flexible hierarchy of measures might<br />
be appropriate, (see Appendix A7), although administrative costs need<br />
consideration.<br />
4B.21 <strong>The</strong> thermal insulation benefits obtainable from secondary glazing, or<br />
replacement double glazing, should be taken into account, and linkages<br />
made, as far as possible, with fuel poverty work. As with roads, the<br />
insulation package specified in the railway noise regulations provides only<br />
for sound insulation to habitable rooms (bedrooms, living rooms, and<br />
kitchens also used for dining). This does not reflect modern ‘whole house<br />
living’ lifestyles. Any new regulations should consider insulation<br />
specifications closer to those in the Building Regulations which are then<br />
in force, including taking account of other noise sources where necessary<br />
(see Appendix A7).<br />
policy 24<br />
<strong>The</strong> Mayor will urge the Government to use the National <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong><br />
<strong>Strategy</strong> process to review relevant provisions of the Land Compensation Act<br />
1973 and <strong>Noise</strong> Insulation (Railways and Other Guided Transport Systems)<br />
Regulations 1996 (amended 1998), making appropriate financial grant<br />
provision to accompany any change. Consideration should be given to a<br />
flexible hierarchy of measures for cost-effective protection of a wider range<br />
of properties. Work should, wherever possible, be integrated across different<br />
noise sources, and with fuel poverty and climate change-related measures.