28.12.2014 Views

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> Mayor of <strong>London</strong> 107<br />

policy 23<br />

<strong>The</strong> Mayor will urge boroughs to consider including, in their Unitary<br />

Development Plans, proposals to enhance the noise screening provided by<br />

development alongside railways, having regard to benefits for the wider<br />

area. <strong>Noise</strong> reduction in the wider neighbourhood should be taken into<br />

account as a benefit by local planning authorities in assessing design in<br />

applications for development alongside or over suitable railways. Decked<br />

or bridging development is most likely to be acceptable where railways are<br />

below adjacent ground levels.<br />

Building insulation<br />

4B.20 Current <strong>Noise</strong> Insulation Regulations for railways are based on the<br />

principle that noise from existing facilities is already known to local<br />

residents, and reflected in property values. New railways may not have<br />

been expected by existing property owners, who may be eligible for<br />

compensation (see Appendix A7). As with roads, the regulations do not<br />

apply where the use of existing lines is intensified. However, investment<br />

in better track and trains should mean that, in many cases, the noise<br />

generated by each train will be lower. <strong>The</strong> preparation of a National<br />

<strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> 5 provides the Government with the information<br />

and the opportunity for a review. Issues include whether the historic<br />

‘noise threshold’ and package of measures in the <strong>Noise</strong> Insulation<br />

Regulations are still relevant. A more flexible hierarchy of measures might<br />

be appropriate, (see Appendix A7), although administrative costs need<br />

consideration.<br />

4B.21 <strong>The</strong> thermal insulation benefits obtainable from secondary glazing, or<br />

replacement double glazing, should be taken into account, and linkages<br />

made, as far as possible, with fuel poverty work. As with roads, the<br />

insulation package specified in the railway noise regulations provides only<br />

for sound insulation to habitable rooms (bedrooms, living rooms, and<br />

kitchens also used for dining). This does not reflect modern ‘whole house<br />

living’ lifestyles. Any new regulations should consider insulation<br />

specifications closer to those in the Building Regulations which are then<br />

in force, including taking account of other noise sources where necessary<br />

(see Appendix A7).<br />

policy 24<br />

<strong>The</strong> Mayor will urge the Government to use the National <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong><br />

<strong>Strategy</strong> process to review relevant provisions of the Land Compensation Act<br />

1973 and <strong>Noise</strong> Insulation (Railways and Other Guided Transport Systems)<br />

Regulations 1996 (amended 1998), making appropriate financial grant<br />

provision to accompany any change. Consideration should be given to a<br />

flexible hierarchy of measures for cost-effective protection of a wider range<br />

of properties. Work should, wherever possible, be integrated across different<br />

noise sources, and with fuel poverty and climate change-related measures.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!