28.12.2014 Views

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

172 Mayor of <strong>London</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong><br />

northern European countries with higher urban densities than the UK also<br />

have higher standards of external and internal noise insulation. Higher<br />

standards of building management are also common, with more restrictions<br />

and/or shared understandings, such as on times for noisy activities.<br />

4F.9 Poor internal noise insulation increases the risk of problems between<br />

neighbours, adding to the stress people experience and demands on public<br />

services, including the nuisance noise services of local authority<br />

Environmental Health departments. While parties, excessively powerful<br />

home entertainment systems, and other unneighbourly behaviour may<br />

present the most acute problems, many homes are so poorly insulated that<br />

the ordinary everyday activities of neighbours may cause distress. Problems<br />

may be particularly severe in some flats in converted houses, where<br />

households may be separated only by suspended timber floors and thin<br />

plasterboard partitions. Poor internal design of flats or terraces, with<br />

conflicting uses adjacent to each other (for example a living room of one<br />

flat above a bedroom of another) can further increase the likelihood of<br />

neighbour noise conflicts. Cases in 1999 in the House of Lords (often<br />

referred to as ‘Baxter and Mills’ 5 ) resulted in a ruling that a landlord did<br />

not have to rectify poor sound insulation between dwellings or pay<br />

damages to a tenant due to any resulting nuisance. It was also ruled that<br />

reasonable activities by the neighbouring tenants could not be an<br />

actionable nuisance. Property owners and occupiers may be unaware of all<br />

the measures they could take to reduce the impact of external or internal<br />

noise. High costs and uncertain quality of building work may deter people<br />

from improving noise insulation. Acoustic performance is easily undermined<br />

by poor skills, incorrect materials, and inadequate regulation.<br />

4F.10 People may suffer from poor insulation, both against external noise, and<br />

from noise generated within adjacent flats or attached buildings. Just<br />

reducing external noise could make internal noise more apparent. Internal<br />

and external noise problems need to be considered together. Proposals to<br />

raise sound insulation standards and extend the scope of Part E of the<br />

Building Regulations were made by the Government in January 2001. In<br />

addition to new houses and self-contained flats, scope would be<br />

extended to include hotel rooms, hostels, student accommodation, nurses’<br />

homes and homes for older people. Standards regarding low frequency<br />

noise transmission, such as from TV and sound system bass notes, would<br />

be raised. BRE estimated 6 that in new dwellings, as many as 40% of new<br />

separating floors, and up to 25% of new separating walls might fail to<br />

meet the then current standards. Testing was therefore proposed before<br />

final building completion. <strong>The</strong> Government announced 7 that amendments<br />

to Part E on sound insulation would come into force on 1 July 2003. This<br />

introduced the standards proposed in January 2001, including pre-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!