28.12.2014 Views

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

The Mayor's Ambient Noise Strategy - Greater London Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Mayor’s <strong>Ambient</strong> <strong>Noise</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> Mayor of <strong>London</strong> 73<br />

4A.30 <strong>Noise</strong> mapping provides opportunities to examine how noise propagation<br />

from roads may be modified. <strong>The</strong> effectiveness of noise barriers or making<br />

cutting walls and other surfaces sound absorbing can be assessed. Costs<br />

and benefits need to be assessed in relation to other mitigation options,<br />

including building insulation, taking account of noise benefits for gardens,<br />

open spaces and pedestrian areas.<br />

policy 9<br />

As resources allow, Transport for <strong>London</strong> will, and <strong>London</strong> boroughs and<br />

others should, investigate the potential benefits of noise barriers, other<br />

noise screening and acoustic modifications to highway structures, where<br />

source-related measures would not be effective. Account must be taken<br />

of pedestrian severance and security, vandalism, visual amenity, historic<br />

building and conservation issues, sight-lines and other road safety issues.<br />

Spatial planning and urban design<br />

4A.31 Design innovation to achieve high quality self-protecting forms of<br />

development will need to be encouraged in both redevelopment and<br />

refurbishment alongside busier roads. Suitably self-protecting<br />

development with continuous or near-continuous façades, and linking<br />

development between existing detached properties, can reduce the<br />

propagation of noise, although reverberation, particularly within narrower<br />

‘street canyons’ should also be considered. Development which provides<br />

occupants with a ‘quiet side’ away from the road is generally to be<br />

preferred to development at right angles to the road, where both sides of<br />

the building would be equally noisy. Self-protecting development should,<br />

however, still provide for ‘eyes on the street’ - so that activity on the<br />

street can be seen by adjacent occupiers, to help discourage crime and<br />

vandalism. Good design can enhance opportunities for development of<br />

roadside land, or conversion of buildings to noise-sensitive uses.<br />

Developers and local planning authorities will in many cases have a<br />

mutual interest in achieving noise-related improvements.<br />

4A.32 Given the demands for housing, economic and other development in<br />

<strong>London</strong>, it will rarely be possible to rely on distance alone to protect<br />

sensitive uses from road traffic noise. One advantage of mixed-use<br />

schemes is that they offer opportunities for the more noise-sensitive uses<br />

to be screened by other activities. Development over suitable roads,<br />

especially in cutting, could provide space for <strong>London</strong>’s development<br />

needs, while providing noise protection to the surrounding area. It is<br />

recognised that the number of suitable locations is limited, and issues<br />

such as fire safety, control of air pollution, biodiversity, visual amenity and<br />

maintenance need to be considered. Design must be to the highest<br />

standards and proposals must be socially and environmentally acceptable<br />

in other respects. Planning Policy Guidance Note 24 ‘Planning and <strong>Noise</strong>’,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!