10.07.2015 Views

essential-guide-to-qualitative-in-organizational-research

essential-guide-to-qualitative-in-organizational-research

essential-guide-to-qualitative-in-organizational-research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

258 –––––––––– QUALITATIVE METHODS IN ORGANIZATION STUDIES ––––––––––––––––––Hierarchical cod<strong>in</strong>gA key feature of template analysis is the hierarchical organization of codes, with groups ofsimilar codes clustered <strong>to</strong>gether <strong>to</strong> produce more general higher-order codes. Return<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>the workplace counsell<strong>in</strong>g example, separate codes relat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> ‘unrealistic client expectations’,‘uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty about availability of resources’ and ‘confusion <strong>in</strong> relationships with outsideagencies’ might be <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle higher-order code, ‘effects of lack of role clarity’.Hierarchical cod<strong>in</strong>g allows the <strong>research</strong>er <strong>to</strong> analyse texts at vary<strong>in</strong>g levels of specificity. Broadhigher-order codes can give a good overview of the general direction of the <strong>in</strong>terview, whiledetailed lower-order codes allow for very f<strong>in</strong>e dist<strong>in</strong>ctions <strong>to</strong> be made, both with<strong>in</strong> andbetween cases. There can be as many levels of cod<strong>in</strong>g as the <strong>research</strong>er f<strong>in</strong>ds useful, but it isworth bear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that <strong>to</strong>o many levels can be counter productive <strong>to</strong> the goal of atta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gclarity <strong>in</strong> organiz<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g the data.Parallel cod<strong>in</strong>gTemplate analysis usually permits parallel cod<strong>in</strong>g of segments of text, whereby the samesegment is classified with<strong>in</strong> two (or more) different codes at the same level. Parallel cod<strong>in</strong>gis only likely <strong>to</strong> be problematic <strong>in</strong> <strong>research</strong> which is located strongly <strong>to</strong>wards the positivisticend of the <strong>qualitative</strong> <strong>research</strong> spectrum, where <strong>research</strong>ers may wish <strong>to</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>e templateanalysis with elements of quantitative content analysis.The study: manag<strong>in</strong>g mental health <strong>in</strong> primary careThe project I will be describ<strong>in</strong>g here exam<strong>in</strong>ed general practitioners’ decisions about themanagement of patients with mental health problems, with a particular emphasis on theirunderstand<strong>in</strong>g of service delivery and organization. This is an area that has long beenrecognized as problematic for primary care (for example, Freel<strong>in</strong>g and Tylee, 1992). It wascommissioned by the relevant health authority <strong>in</strong> the hope that it would <strong>in</strong>form choices aboutthe mental health services purchased on behalf of GPs by the authority. The <strong>research</strong> wascarried out by myself and Julia Maskrey. Two ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>research</strong> questions were posed:1. What fac<strong>to</strong>rs do GPs perceive <strong>to</strong> be <strong>in</strong>fluential <strong>in</strong> their mental healthtreatment/management decisions?2. What are GPs’ experiences of and attitudes <strong>to</strong>wards mental health service providers?The study district was largely urban, but with a very mixed population <strong>in</strong> terms of class andethnicity. The 13 participat<strong>in</strong>g GPs were recruited with the assistance of local GPrepresentatives <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>clude a cross-section of practice areas. Three of the GPs were female and10 were male. The average age of the GPs was 30 and the average length of time spent <strong>in</strong> theprofession was n<strong>in</strong>e-and-a-half years.The method chosen for this study was that of focus group <strong>in</strong>terviews. Focus groups are avaluable way of ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> shared understand<strong>in</strong>gs and beliefs, while still allow<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>dividual differences of op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>to</strong> be voiced. They enable participants <strong>to</strong> hear the views andexperiences of their peers, and cause them <strong>to</strong> reflect back on their own experiences and thoughts.At the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of each focus group, each GP was asked <strong>to</strong> comment on one of six previously

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!