10.07.2015 Views

essential-guide-to-qualitative-in-organizational-research

essential-guide-to-qualitative-in-organizational-research

essential-guide-to-qualitative-in-organizational-research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

362 –––––––––– QUALITATIVE METHODS IN ORGANIZATION STUDIES ––––––––––––––––––and perspectives (Ben<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>n and Hartley, 2003). Nonaka (1994) has suggested a ‘spiral’ ofknowledge creation based on social <strong>in</strong>teraction loops with<strong>in</strong> teams and organizations.There are a number of arguments for a co-production approach, such as co-<strong>research</strong>, <strong>in</strong>develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>organizational</strong> theory. First, organizations are complex phenomena that requiresome ‘<strong>in</strong>sider’ knowledge if they are <strong>to</strong> be navigated <strong>in</strong> ways <strong>to</strong> produce theory and knowledgewith high reliability and validity (Easterby-Smith and Mal<strong>in</strong>a, 1999). The size and complexityof many organizations means that a <strong>research</strong> study often requires help from <strong>in</strong>dividuals with<strong>in</strong>the organization who can identify and locate appropriate <strong>in</strong>formants for the study and whocan work with the <strong>research</strong>ers <strong>to</strong> translate the <strong>organizational</strong> phenomena <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the conceptualcategories of the study (Buchanan et al., 1988).Second, academics are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly recogniz<strong>in</strong>g and analys<strong>in</strong>g <strong>organizational</strong> complexity.The <strong>in</strong>stability, flux and change of organizations means that ‘mono-method monopolies’(Mart<strong>in</strong>, 1989) have <strong>to</strong> be replaced by multi-methods, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>qualitative</strong> methods (see alsoLangley, 1999). Thus, there is a grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> collaborative <strong>research</strong> which reflects thistype of epistemology.CO-RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––Co-<strong>research</strong> is a methodology based on <strong>in</strong>ter-<strong>organizational</strong> collaboration between academicsand practitioners. It aims <strong>to</strong> establish a dialectical process of enquiry by draw<strong>in</strong>g on thecomplementary, and sometimes conflict<strong>in</strong>g perspectives, <strong>in</strong>terests, skills and knowledge basesof both academics and practitioners. The <strong>research</strong> is designed and developed under the overalldirection of the academic team leader and deliberately uses <strong>in</strong>siders and outsiders, theoristsand practitioners, with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>research</strong> team.It is particularly relevant where the <strong>research</strong> requires a case study design, which emphasizesthe study of <strong>organizational</strong> processes <strong>in</strong> context (Hartley, Chapter 26, this volume; Y<strong>in</strong>, 1994).Co-<strong>research</strong> employs a range of methods familiar <strong>to</strong> the social sciences, such as <strong>in</strong>terviews,observation, questionnaires and analysis of documents.CO-RESEARCH ROLES IN THE RESEARCH TEAM ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––There are three different <strong>research</strong> roles with<strong>in</strong> a co-<strong>research</strong> team: the academic, the hos<strong>to</strong>fficer and the co-<strong>in</strong>terviewer (see Figure 29.1). First, there is the academic, who takes overallresponsibility for the <strong>research</strong> and leads the <strong>research</strong> team. There may also be other academics<strong>in</strong> the team. The academics contribute an <strong>in</strong>itial conceptual framework and help <strong>to</strong> shape,develop and modify this with the whole co-<strong>research</strong> team. The academics also provideexpertise <strong>in</strong> <strong>research</strong> design and methods. Inevitably, the academics are ‘outsiders’ <strong>to</strong> theorganization which is be<strong>in</strong>g studied. The <strong>research</strong> leader manages the overall project, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gthe preparations for the study, the analysis and the writ<strong>in</strong>g up (though unlike some othercollaborative methodologies, the co-<strong>research</strong>ers are also expected <strong>to</strong> engage <strong>in</strong> all theseactivities).Second, there is the ‘host officer’ who is employed by the organization be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>research</strong>ed.This person is <strong>in</strong> a relatively senior and generally corporate position. He or she arranges the<strong>in</strong>terviews (accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the <strong>research</strong> design) and also amasses the relevant <strong>organizational</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!