10.07.2015 Views

essential-guide-to-qualitative-in-organizational-research

essential-guide-to-qualitative-in-organizational-research

essential-guide-to-qualitative-in-organizational-research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18 –––––––––– QUALITATIVE METHODS IN ORGANIZATION STUDIES ––––––––––––––––––<strong>in</strong>terviewee, who may agree out of a wish <strong>to</strong> please you, or just <strong>to</strong> be polite. In the examplejust given, it would be better <strong>to</strong> say: ‘What, if any, impact did the scheme have on <strong>in</strong>terprofessionalcommunication?’ This would not give a cue <strong>to</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terviewee that you expecta certa<strong>in</strong> reply.You need <strong>to</strong> beware of assum<strong>in</strong>g that the answer <strong>to</strong> a question is so obvious that it neednot be asked. For <strong>in</strong>stance, while promotion might well be a significant goal for most middlemanagers<strong>in</strong> a large corporation, it would be wrong <strong>to</strong> assume that it would be so for any onemanager. In a <strong>qualitative</strong> study you would need <strong>to</strong> ask whether, and <strong>to</strong> what extent,promotion was important <strong>to</strong> each <strong>in</strong>dividual participant. You should not tell the <strong>in</strong>tervieweewhat his or her answers mean – ‘So what you’re really say<strong>in</strong>g is . . .’; aga<strong>in</strong>, your perceptionmay be wrong, but the <strong>in</strong>terviewee may not feel able or will<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> challenge themis<strong>in</strong>terpretation. It is, however, sometimes useful <strong>to</strong> repeat an answer back <strong>to</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terviewee<strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> seek clarification.ENDING THE INTERVIEWIt is important that you avoid end<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>terview on a <strong>to</strong>pic which is difficult, threaten<strong>in</strong>gor pa<strong>in</strong>ful. If possible the conclud<strong>in</strong>g questions should steer the <strong>in</strong>terview <strong>to</strong>wards positiveexperiences; <strong>in</strong> any event the <strong>in</strong>terviewer should not pack up and leave immediately afterprob<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>terviewee about some highly negative, distress<strong>in</strong>g or personal experience orfeel<strong>in</strong>g. Sometimes it is useful <strong>to</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ish by giv<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>terviewee the opportunity <strong>to</strong> makeany comments about the subject at hand which have not been covered <strong>in</strong> the rest of the<strong>in</strong>terview.‘DIFFICULT’ INTERVIEWSNot all <strong>in</strong>terviews will progress smoothly. Occasionally you will come away from an <strong>in</strong>terviewfeel<strong>in</strong>g dissatisfied with your own performance, or irritated, angry or upset by the <strong>in</strong>terviewee.While it is impossible <strong>to</strong> specify all the ways <strong>in</strong> which <strong>in</strong>terviews can be difficult, there aresome situations where difficulties are rather more common than usual, and by be<strong>in</strong>g awareof these it is possible <strong>to</strong> have cop<strong>in</strong>g strategies <strong>to</strong> hand if and when they do occur. Some tipsabout how <strong>to</strong> deal with common types of ‘difficult’ <strong>in</strong>terview are given below.THE UNCOMMUNICATIVE INTERVIEWEEThere are some <strong>in</strong>terviewees who seem unable, or unwill<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>to</strong> give anyth<strong>in</strong>g more thanmonosyllabic answers. The reasons for this vary widely: they may be defensive about the <strong>to</strong>picbe<strong>in</strong>g discussed; they may be try<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> get the <strong>in</strong>terview over with as quickly as possible; theymay th<strong>in</strong>k that brief answers are what you want ; they may just be habitually laconic. The risksof monosyllabism can be reduced before the <strong>in</strong>terview beg<strong>in</strong>s by be<strong>in</strong>g quite clear about howmuch time you require – and that the <strong>in</strong>terviewee has the time available – and by stress<strong>in</strong>gthe anonymity of all answers. If the <strong>in</strong>terviewee is unresponsive despite such precautions, thefirst th<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> check is that you are phras<strong>in</strong>g questions <strong>in</strong> as open a way as possible. If you aresucceed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> fram<strong>in</strong>g questions <strong>in</strong> a very open manner, and still gett<strong>in</strong>g brief, shallow answers,a useful <strong>to</strong>ol <strong>to</strong> use is silence. Instead of mov<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>to</strong> your next question when the<strong>in</strong>terviewee provides another terse response, pause for a few seconds. Very often this will serveas a cue <strong>to</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terviewee that you would like <strong>to</strong> hear more on the subject, and is less likely<strong>to</strong> annoy him or her than repeated probes of the ‘Tell me more’ type.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!