22.11.2012 Views

Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia

Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia

Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Even though weather was identified at the outset as the most significant risk factor, this factor only<br />

affected production for 14% of the survey program. Analysis of the breakdown figures over time<br />

revealed that the majority of the weather impacts on productivity occurred in the summer months,<br />

when inclement weather related to storm activity was more prevalent. The weather downtime was<br />

increased by the lack of weather radar and reliable forecasts in Botswana. The pilots had to err on the<br />

side of caution at times and often didn’t fly due to the risk of a fast approaching storm. Mobile weather<br />

stations that could transmit data via the mobile telephone network were deployed at high points<br />

(telecommunications towers etc.) around the survey area to assist in the safety mitigation.<br />

Even with the caution exercised during inclement weather, there was one serious incident where a<br />

severe updraft was experienced which violently lifted the airship above its planned flight-path.<br />

Although there were no injuries, the incident caused structural damage to the airship which in turn<br />

caused several months of unexpected downtime before the repairs could be completed. In total, 16%<br />

of the project duration was lost while waiting for hangar availability.<br />

The statutory annual inspections consumed 8% of the available flying days, and the Bell instrument<br />

was down 5% of the time.<br />

Value-Add of Airship Data<br />

The most important output that was sought from the airship gravity data was to identify the responses<br />

of kimberlites with the targeted physical parameters. Upon conclusion of a drill program, a new<br />

kimberlite had been discovered from the AGG response plotted in Figure 5. From constrained<br />

modelling of ground geophysical data, this body was interpreted to have a surface area of 2.0 Ha. In<br />

addition to the outcomes from orientation surveys over known kimberlites, this discovery demonstrated<br />

that the airship could indeed detect bodies of the minimum target specifications.<br />

Figure 5. Tzz vertical gravity gradient response of a kimberlite (star symbol) discovered from<br />

airship data adjacent to a faulted boundary<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!