22.11.2012 Views

Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia

Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia

Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

forms of density variations within a layer: (a) a constant, (b) changes with depth, (c) varying<br />

horizontally, and (d) changes both vertically and horizontally. The most general cases may be defined<br />

by a voxet. In practice, a velocity voxet may be available when gravity and/or gravity gradient data are<br />

used to help interpret a horizon that may be difficult to image using seismic methods (e.g., base salt).<br />

We can convert this velocity voxet into a density voxet using, for example, a simple velocity-density<br />

relationship or a more complex relationship such as a 3D variogram derived from geostatistical<br />

analysis.<br />

A voxet may be divided vertically into a number of laminas (thin sheets). Each lamina is equivalent to a<br />

surface density distribution � on a horizontal plane. The gravity effect g on the top surface of a lamina<br />

can be written in the wavenumber domain as<br />

�g�K�� ��F���K��<br />

F � 2<br />

(1)<br />

where � is the gravitational constant, K the wavenumber vector, and F stands for the Fourier<br />

transform. Applying an upward continuation, we obtain the gravity effect on a horizontal plane at<br />

altitude z:<br />

F<br />

� K z<br />

�g�K�� ��e F���K��<br />

� 2 (2)<br />

Summing up the effects of all laminas produces the total gravity effect. We can apply other operations<br />

in the wavenumber domain to compute the gravity gradient components T XX , T XY , T XZ , T YY , T YZ ,<br />

T ZZ , TUV � �TYY � TXX<br />

� 2 and the total magnetic intensity � T . Here X points to the east, Y to the<br />

north, and Z is vertical down.<br />

For inversion, Bott (1960) proposed a very simple update formula for interpretation of gravity<br />

anomalies over a sedimentary basin. The gravity effect due to an infinite horizontal slab is a constant<br />

independent of the vertical position (i.e., burial depth) and the horizontal location of observation:<br />

g � 2���t<br />

(3)<br />

where � is the bulk density (contrast) of the slab, and t the thickness of the slab. Rearranging<br />

equation (3) produces<br />

g<br />

t � (4)<br />

2���<br />

This equation can be used to compute the depth change of a horizon, point by point. The depth<br />

inversion is accomplished with an iterative process.<br />

More sophisticated algorithms for forward and inverse modeling are needed in practice. For example,<br />

equation (4) cannot be used to update depth when the magnetic anomaly or a gravity gradient<br />

component is inverted. We have developed advanced and efficient algorithms that can invert not only<br />

a field or gradient component individually but also a selection of any number of field and gradient<br />

components simultaneously. Below, I present a joint inversion example.<br />

Example<br />

Our test model consisted of a seawater layer, sediments, a salt body and a basement (Figure 1,<br />

Figure 3a). Each of the depth grids was quite large, having 960 rows and 960 columns. Each cell<br />

represents an area of 25 m by 25 m. The sediments had a complex density variation, defined by a<br />

voxet that each cell is 1500 m by 1500 m by 150 m in size. Figure 1 shows the base of salt and the<br />

density distribution of the initial 3D model. Figure 2a displays three maps and five east-west crosssections<br />

for this starting model. Note that the starting model is the same as the true model except for<br />

the base of salt.<br />

126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!