Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />
forms of density variations within a layer: (a) a constant, (b) changes with depth, (c) varying<br />
horizontally, and (d) changes both vertically and horizontally. The most general cases may be defined<br />
by a voxet. In practice, a velocity voxet may be available when gravity and/or gravity gradient data are<br />
used to help interpret a horizon that may be difficult to image using seismic methods (e.g., base salt).<br />
We can convert this velocity voxet into a density voxet using, for example, a simple velocity-density<br />
relationship or a more complex relationship such as a 3D variogram derived from geostatistical<br />
analysis.<br />
A voxet may be divided vertically into a number of laminas (thin sheets). Each lamina is equivalent to a<br />
surface density distribution � on a horizontal plane. The gravity effect g on the top surface of a lamina<br />
can be written in the wavenumber domain as<br />
�g�K�� ��F���K��<br />
F � 2<br />
(1)<br />
where � is the gravitational constant, K the wavenumber vector, and F stands for the Fourier<br />
transform. Applying an upward continuation, we obtain the gravity effect on a horizontal plane at<br />
altitude z:<br />
F<br />
� K z<br />
�g�K�� ��e F���K��<br />
� 2 (2)<br />
Summing up the effects of all laminas produces the total gravity effect. We can apply other operations<br />
in the wavenumber domain to compute the gravity gradient components T XX , T XY , T XZ , T YY , T YZ ,<br />
T ZZ , TUV � �TYY � TXX<br />
� 2 and the total magnetic intensity � T . Here X points to the east, Y to the<br />
north, and Z is vertical down.<br />
For inversion, Bott (1960) proposed a very simple update formula for interpretation of gravity<br />
anomalies over a sedimentary basin. The gravity effect due to an infinite horizontal slab is a constant<br />
independent of the vertical position (i.e., burial depth) and the horizontal location of observation:<br />
g � 2���t<br />
(3)<br />
where � is the bulk density (contrast) of the slab, and t the thickness of the slab. Rearranging<br />
equation (3) produces<br />
g<br />
t � (4)<br />
2���<br />
This equation can be used to compute the depth change of a horizon, point by point. The depth<br />
inversion is accomplished with an iterative process.<br />
More sophisticated algorithms for forward and inverse modeling are needed in practice. For example,<br />
equation (4) cannot be used to update depth when the magnetic anomaly or a gravity gradient<br />
component is inverted. We have developed advanced and efficient algorithms that can invert not only<br />
a field or gradient component individually but also a selection of any number of field and gradient<br />
components simultaneously. Below, I present a joint inversion example.<br />
Example<br />
Our test model consisted of a seawater layer, sediments, a salt body and a basement (Figure 1,<br />
Figure 3a). Each of the depth grids was quite large, having 960 rows and 960 columns. Each cell<br />
represents an area of 25 m by 25 m. The sediments had a complex density variation, defined by a<br />
voxet that each cell is 1500 m by 1500 m by 150 m in size. Figure 1 shows the base of salt and the<br />
density distribution of the initial 3D model. Figure 2a displays three maps and five east-west crosssections<br />
for this starting model. Note that the starting model is the same as the true model except for<br />
the base of salt.<br />
126