Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />
Terrain correction and its effect on 3D inversion of<br />
airborne gravity gradiometry data<br />
Yaoguo Li 1 , M. Andy Kass 2 , Kristofer Davis 3 , Marco Braga 4 , and Cericia Martinez 5<br />
1 <strong>Gravity</strong> and Magnetics Research Consortium, Department of Geophysics, Colorado School<br />
of Mines (ygli@mines.edu)<br />
2 <strong>Gravity</strong> and Magnetics Research Consortium, Department of Geophysics, Colorado School<br />
of Mines<br />
3 <strong>Gravity</strong> and Magnetics Research Consortium, Department of Geophysics, Colorado School<br />
of Mines<br />
4 Iron Ore Division, Vale<br />
5 <strong>Gravity</strong> and Magnetics Research Consortium, Department of Geophysics, Colorado School<br />
of Mines<br />
Abstract<br />
The terrain effect generally dominates airborne gravity gradiometer measurements, and this issue<br />
must be dealt with as part of the interpretation process. Terrain corrections must be calculated in an<br />
accurate and consistent manner. To accomplish this, the required terrain resolution and the effect of<br />
low-pass filtering of the data in acquisition and processing must be understood. Furthermore, efficient<br />
computation of terrain effect within a reasonable time frame is required to process and interpret largescale<br />
data sets. In this paper, we will examine the issues and develop practical algorithms for<br />
addressing them. We will illustrate the discussion using both synthetic and field examples, including a<br />
set of airborne gravity gradiometry data acquired for iron exploration.<br />
Introduction<br />
The terrain effect is usually the dominant component in airborne gravity gradiometer (AGG) data. It<br />
manifests itself as a high amplitude signal over a wide range of scales or wavenumber bands. A<br />
reliable method to remove the terrain effect is a pre-requisite for any interpretation technique in AGG<br />
work. As a result, the quality of terrain correction and the efficiency when calculating the correction<br />
directly determines the applicability and quality of each of the plethora of available interpretation tools.<br />
Two particular aspects of terrain correction are crucial. We examine these and demonstrate their effect<br />
on quantitative interpretation using a generalized 3D inversion algorithm.<br />
The first aspect is the practical issue of the efficiency of the terrain calculation process itself. We have<br />
developed a space-domain based fast algorithm that uses an adaptive mesh representation of a digital<br />
elevation model (DEM) and incorporates a user-specified error tolerance for the calculated terrain<br />
effect. The algorithm can achieve significant computational speed-up over conventional algorithms.<br />
This efficiency enables routine calculation of, and reliable correction for, the terrain effect using the<br />
highest DEM resolution dictated by the terrain clearance and the acquisition system filters.<br />
The second aspect is the importance of frequency matching in terrain correction and the<br />
corresponding requirements on the resolution of DEM. This issue stems from the fact that acquisition<br />
systems necessarily employ a set of low-pass filters in order to reduce high-frequency noise. A<br />
consequence of applying a low pass filter is the modification of the geological and terrain response in<br />
the same high frequency band. We examine the importance of matching the frequency content of the<br />
terrain corrections to an estimate of the low-pass filtering, and then quantify the optimal DEM<br />
resolution that meets the requirement for reliable terrain correction whilst allowing an efficient<br />
calculation process to be applied.<br />
In the following, we will first discuss an efficient terrain correction algorithm that is based on adaptive<br />
quadtree disretization of a DEM. This approach can accelerate the calculation by up to two orders of<br />
magnitude in comparison with a brute force approach. We then discuss terrain resolution and the<br />
effect of low-pass filtering used in acquisition systems. We conclude with an example of quantitative<br />
131