Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />
(a)<br />
Figure 6. (a) L� error of the unfiltered Tzz gravity gradient component of the terrain model as a<br />
function of terrain resolution. (b) L� error of the acquisition filtered Tzz gravity gradient<br />
component of the terrain model as a function of terrain resolution. Note the change in scale from<br />
(a), and that increasing the resolution to better than 20 m does not further decrease the error<br />
from those obtained when using a lower resolution model.<br />
3D Inversion of <strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> Gradiometry Data<br />
Our 3D inversion algorithm is based on that presented by Li (2001) and utilizes the numerical<br />
techniques outlined by Li and Oldenburg (2003). Assume gradiometer data are available at a set of<br />
� T<br />
observation points, d � ( d1,<br />
d 2 , �,<br />
d N ) , where N is the total number of data, which may contain<br />
any number of the independent components or combinations of them. We discretize the density<br />
distribution below the data area into contiguous prismatic cells. We assume each cell has a constant<br />
density contrast, and these form the unknowns in the inverse problem. We denote the model as<br />
T<br />
M ) , , , ( �<br />
� � �1<br />
�2<br />
� � , where M is the number of cells. With such a parameterization, the forward<br />
modeling is given by a system of linear equations that relates the data to the model vector by a<br />
sensitivity matrix G:<br />
�<br />
d � G , (3)<br />
� �<br />
and the element g ij of G quantify the contribution of the j'th cell to the i'th datum. The terms in the<br />
sensitivity matrix are a function of the geometry of the discretization, and they can be calculated by<br />
evaluating the integral in equation (2) over each rectangular cell.<br />
We construct a minimum structure density contrast distribution by using the Tikhonov regularization,<br />
subject to bound constraints on the model,<br />
minimize � � �d<br />
� ���<br />
(4)<br />
� � �<br />
subject to a � � � b<br />
where � is a regularization parameter, �d and �� are respectively the data misfit and model objective<br />
functions, and a � and b � are vectors containing the lower and upper bounds on density contrast.<br />
The data misfit is given by<br />
137<br />
(b)