22.11.2012 Views

Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia

Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia

Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

A Turnkey <strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> System – Concept to<br />

reality<br />

Introduction<br />

Nigel Brady 1<br />

1 Micro-g Lacoste Inc. (nigel@microglacoste.com)<br />

<strong>Airborne</strong> gravity surveying has been performed with widely varying degrees of success since early<br />

experimentation with the Lacoste and Romberg dynamic meter in the 1950s (Nettleton et al., 1960).<br />

There are a number of different survey systems currently in operation including relative gravity meters<br />

and gradiometers. However, there are presently a number of roadblocks to achieving high quality<br />

results at a low cost, including market availability for those who wish to own and operate a survey<br />

system.<br />

<strong>Airborne</strong> gravity survey operations have historically had difficulty in producing the desired data quality<br />

at the significant cost advantage claimed per line kilometre when compared with a ground based<br />

survey. <strong>Airborne</strong> surveys represent an expensive investment in equipment and skilled personnel, and<br />

survey operators must provide a reasonable return on that investment to stay viable. There are a<br />

number of factors involved in realizing the potential that airborne gravity offers and if any one of them<br />

is deficient the survey can quickly turn the cost benefit ratio negative.<br />

<strong>Airborne</strong> operations are logistically complex as they require an airport, hangar and FBO (Fixed Base of<br />

Operations) support. Survey operations normally involve at least, pilots, equipment operators, aircraft<br />

maintenance and a geologist/geophysicist for planning and data quality control. Equipment<br />

maintenance and repair downtime can add significant time and cost to the survey. The data quality<br />

itself can be highly reliant on the operator and data processor’s experience and skill levels as well as<br />

the flight characteristics of the aircraft. Finally the data is of much lower value without a very accurate<br />

positioning and timing system.<br />

In 2004, Lacoste and Romberg (now Micro-g Lacoste) decided to build on their success with the newly<br />

developed AirSea II dynamic meter and use that system as the basis for a dedicated airborne<br />

gravity instrument. The Air Sea II was designed as a marine gravity meter but can be adapted to run<br />

in an airborne configuration. Advances in electronics, timing and positioning technology created the<br />

opportunity to refine both the hardware and software, and to develop a truly turnkey system that would<br />

work well for users with little or no airborne gravity experience as well as those with more extensive<br />

experience.<br />

The following goals were set for the new system to ensure that it would meet or exceed the current<br />

requirements of airborne gravity surveying:<br />

� portability and ease of install and setup,<br />

� reliability and ease of operation,<br />

� a repeat line accuracy of 1 milligal or better with an anomaly wavelength resolution of 5 km or<br />

less,<br />

� develop a complete understanding of the system behaviour that allows corrections rather than<br />

filtering to be used for data reduction, and<br />

� provide for fast data processing in the field by an operator for quality control of daily survey<br />

data.<br />

Hardware Solutions<br />

The AirSea II gravity meter (Figure 1) has been shown to have an accuracy at sea of better than<br />

1 milligal in reasonable sea conditions (i.e., 30,000 – 50,000 milligals of vertical acceleration or less).<br />

However, an airborne installation has an inertial acceleration environment that is significantly different<br />

to the low frequency and symmetric accelerations experienced at sea. Air turbulence experienced in<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!