22.11.2012 Views

Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia

Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia

Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Conclusions<br />

A Zeppelin airship is unique in its ability to provide a very low acceleration environment while also<br />

closely adhering to a prescribed flight-path in a variety of wind conditions. Over a major test area, the<br />

Air-FTG® data acquired on a Zeppelin NT airship possessed a noise level of 1.7 E RMS. The airship<br />

flies at ¼ the speed of the standard fixed-wing implementation of the Air-FTG system and it was<br />

shown that features with a wavelength of 100 m could be resolved in the data.<br />

The technical limitation of deploying the airship into the high altitude and hot daytime temperatures of<br />

South-Central Botswana was mitigated through a night-time flight program. An analysis of the<br />

production data showed that for 28% of the time, the airship was unable to fly due to technical<br />

problems, a figure that far exceeded the original estimates. During the duration of the survey program,<br />

the airship was flown and moored fulltime in the harsh Kalahari Desert conditions. The downtime in a<br />

future program would be reduced if the program was conducted in a more hospitable environment or if<br />

hangar facilities are available. Additionally, if a later production model had been available, it would<br />

likely have improved reliability over the pre-production prototype airship that was deployed.<br />

The second largest impact on the day-to-day productivity of the airship system was weather downtime,<br />

accounting for 14% of the project duration. Given the seasonal winds and violent storms during the<br />

rainy season the observed level of weather downtime was not unexpected. As anticipated, weather<br />

had very little impact during the relatively calm winter period. As with fixed-wing AGG operations, it is<br />

important to identify the best weather window with cool temperatures and light winds and to favour this<br />

period for airborne surveying. The availability of accurate real time weather radar images during future<br />

surveys should increase the productivity levels over those observed. In the absence of such a service,<br />

mobile vehicle mounted weather radar instruments could be deployed in the field to improve<br />

productivity.<br />

The high-quality airship gravity gradient data allowed kimberlite targets to be selected in the Jwaneng<br />

area without the large number of false targets associated with an equivalent fixed-wing survey. This<br />

greatly reduced the time and cost of the subsequent follow-up program. The high quality data acquired<br />

reduced the risk of missing an economic body, and a new kimberlite was discovered over an area that<br />

had been heavily prospected utilizing other techniques.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The authors would like to thank De Beers Group Services for permission to publish this paper and for<br />

the invaluable assistance provided during the roll-out of the project by many individuals at Bell<br />

Geospace and Zeppelin Luftshifftechnik.<br />

References<br />

Hatch, D. M., 2004, Evaluation of a Full Tensor <strong>Gravity</strong> Gradiometer for Kimberlite Exploration: In R. J.<br />

L. Lane (editor), <strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> 2004 – Abstracts from the ASEG-PESA <strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> 2004<br />

Workshop: <strong>Geoscience</strong> <strong>Australia</strong>n Record 2004/18, 73-79.<br />

Hatch, D. M., Kuna, S., and Fecher, J., 2006, Evaluation of an Airship Platform for <strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong><br />

Gradiometry: Proceedings of the <strong>Australia</strong>n Earth Sciences Convention, July 2nd-6th, 2006,<br />

Melbourne, <strong>Australia</strong>.<br />

Hatch, D., Murphy, C., Mumaw, G. and Brewster, J., 2006, Performance of the Air-FTG® System<br />

aboard an Airship Platform: Proceedings of the <strong>Australia</strong>n Earth Sciences Convention, July 2nd-<br />

6th, 2006, Melbourne <strong>Australia</strong>.<br />

Hatch, D. M., Murphy, C., Mumaw, G., and Brewster, J., 2007, Performance of the Air-FTG System<br />

aboard an airship platform: Preview, 127, 17 - 22.<br />

Hinks, D., McIntosh, S., and Lane, R. J. L., 2004, A Comparison of the FALCON and Air-FTG®<br />

<strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> Systems at the Kokong Test Block, Botswana: In R. J. L. Lane (editor),<br />

<strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> 2004 – Abstracts from the ASEG-PESA <strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> 2004 Workshop:<br />

<strong>Geoscience</strong> <strong>Australia</strong>n Record 2004/18, 125-134.<br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!