Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />
<strong>Airborne</strong> gravimetry and gravity gradiometry at<br />
Fugro <strong>Airborne</strong> Surveys<br />
Summary<br />
Mark Dransfield 1 , Tiaan Le Roux 2 , and Darren Burrows 3<br />
1 Fugro <strong>Airborne</strong> Geophysics Pty Ltd (mdransfield@fugroairborne.com.au)<br />
2 Fugro <strong>Airborne</strong> Surveys<br />
3 Fugro <strong>Airborne</strong> Surveys<br />
<strong>Gravity</strong> data provide valuable information used in geotechnical, groundwater, mineral and petroleum<br />
exploration, and geodesy applications. The different length scales of interest, increasing in the<br />
preceding list, place different requirements on the gravity acquisition systems. Geographic conditions<br />
are also an important variable since gravity observations may be desired on land, at sea, or from the<br />
air. <strong>Airborne</strong> observations are particularly relevant over lakes, rivers, shallow or deep seas, swamps,<br />
deserts, jungles or mountains. A variety of gravity survey technologies are required to satisfy this<br />
broad range of applications and conditions. Fugro provides gravity services that include processing<br />
and interpretation, on land, at sea and from the air, utilising both gravimeters and gravity gradiometers.<br />
This paper reviews some advances over the last 6 years in airborne exploration applications.<br />
Recent development efforts in airborne gravimetry (AirG) have focused primarily on ‘fit for purpose<br />
solutions’, with an emphasis on operational effectiveness and acquiring data of consistent quality<br />
utilizing the GT-1A instrument technology. Post acquisition improvements include statistical noise<br />
reduction techniques, specialized data processing methods that apply when acquiring data at tighter<br />
line spacing, and 3D regional-scale inversions.<br />
In airborne gravity gradiometer (AGG) surveying, there has been a similar continuing effort on noise<br />
reduction techniques with Fugro’s proprietary FALCON technology. Noise levels have nearly halved<br />
since 2004 and the routine incorporation of regional gravity data has increased the bandwidth of the<br />
processed gravity data. New deployment options have increased the practical range of applications for<br />
FALCON AGG technology. The successful development of a digital AGG has made it possible to<br />
deliver cost-effective helicopter-borne gravity gradiometry, providing increased sensitivity and spatial<br />
resolution. In addition, joint gravity, magnetic and electromagnetic surveys have been demonstrated<br />
from both helicopter and fixed-wing aircraft. The heli-FALCON system is credited with the discovery of<br />
new kimberlites in the Ekati diamond field. Successful fixed-wing survey campaigns have now been<br />
flown in twin-engine aircraft, important for safety reasons in some circumstances. The use of FALCON<br />
AGG systems in oil and gas applications has greatly expanded including wide line-spaced surveys for<br />
regional exploration.<br />
Introduction<br />
<strong>Airborne</strong> measurements of the gravity field can be made using both gravimeters and gravity<br />
gradiometers. The former are limited to providing gravity information at wavelengths above about 5 km<br />
making them more useful in regional studies at basin scale; the latter provide dramatically better<br />
sensitivity at short wavelengths, making gradiometers the preferred technology for mineral exploration<br />
and high resolution oil and gas exploration.<br />
The first airborne gravity gradiometer survey in October 1999 was reported by van Leeuwen (2000)<br />
and results from many surveys have been reported since. Dransfield (2007) has reviewed early<br />
results. The performance of the GT-1A has been reported by Gabell et al. (2004), Ameglio (2005), and<br />
Studinger et al. (2008).<br />
49