Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />
Inversion for density and susceptibility is performed using a Minimum Mean Square Error (MMSE)<br />
method. A statistical approach is used with the MMSE inversion method to obtain the density or<br />
susceptibility models (Sæther, 1997; Haase, 2008). Every density or susceptibility value is treated as<br />
an ’expected value’ with its uncertainty as the ’variance’. In an MMSE inversion, the most probable<br />
densities and variances are derived such that the differences between observed and measured data<br />
are minimised. The advantage of this approach is that the inversion is well-behaved and has a unique<br />
solution. For future application, we are working on the implementation of evolutionary algorithms for<br />
three-dimensional inversion of potential fields and their derivatives (gradients). Evolutionary algorithms<br />
would be used to optimize objective functions for three-dimensional modelling of susceptibility, density,<br />
and conductivity distributions.<br />
Model construction<br />
The process of developing a 3D model with complicated topological structures is a laborious task and<br />
does not easily fit into modern work flows where users demand quick answers and decisions. IGMAS+<br />
provides some special features to minimise this problem:<br />
� The geometry of a model is defined using parallel vertical planes. This configuration allows<br />
easy automatic triangulation as well as visualization in the form of cross sections.<br />
� Semi- or fully automated import of predefined models or information. An import option for<br />
predefined seismic horizons has recently been developed.<br />
� Use of standardized data exchange formats that allow integration of work carried out with<br />
IGMAS+ into complex workflow environments that require the use of several specialized<br />
computer software packages.<br />
Interpreted seismic horizons are generally defined using a large number of irregularly spaced points.<br />
In comparison, the modelling resolution of potential fields is quite modest. If not down sampled, these<br />
picked points will not only inflate the storage size of the model structure, but will place unnecessary<br />
demands on computational resources to perform potential field modelling calculations.<br />
Down sampling may be achieved through a variety of procedures. In IGMAS+, the “Binned Average<br />
Values” algorithm is used. The model space is subdivided into cells. An average value is calculated for<br />
all of the points within each gridded cell. The user can visually control the degree of generalization by<br />
adjusting the cell size of the filter.<br />
Since IGMAS+ needs a polygonal geometry on each of the cross sections of the 3D structure, each<br />
horizon surface has to be cut with vertical sections. The cutting algorithm is very fast and may be<br />
applied to a Delaunay-triangulated surface directly or after an intermediate step of gridding. This<br />
produces a more generalized and smoothed initial model geometry.<br />
Conclusions<br />
IGMAS+ is a software tool which can be used for integrated interpretation in today’s industrial oil and<br />
gas exploration projects. IGMAS+ allows interactive gravity and magnetic modelling to play an<br />
important role in the depth imaging workflows of these complex oil and gas projects (Figure 4).<br />
Integration of workflow and tools is important to meet the needs of today’s more interactive and<br />
interpretative depth imaging techniques.<br />
Current research activities focus on the use of natural language processing (NLP) techniques to<br />
extract semantic constraints from various texts such as reports, publications and books. The aim is to<br />
close the gap between data modelling and “intellectual summaries/descriptions” that are used in free<br />
text documents.<br />
94