Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
Airborne Gravity 2010 - Geoscience Australia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Airborne</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />
seen below, this is especially noticeable in regions of strong curvature of the potential field, or in other<br />
words, where the geological features causing the field anomalies are located. Thus, an interpolation<br />
method for tensors is required which takes their intrinsic physical properties into account.<br />
Following the separation of concerns into amplitude and rotations, a means is sought for smoothly<br />
interpolating rotations and combining this with amplitude estimation. As discussed above, unit<br />
quaternions can be used to parameterize rotations. They form a 4D unit hypersphere and each point<br />
on this hypersphere defines a rotation axis and a rotation angle. Thus, interpolated points lie along<br />
geodesics, which are given by great circles, the analogue of straight line segments in the plane. The<br />
interpolation of points along great circles is achieved by so-called spherical linear interpolation, or<br />
“SLERP” (Shoemake 1995; Kuipers 1999). Currently, full tensor interpolation is implemented in the<br />
Intrepid software as a triangle or 3-point interpolation algorithm. There is a patent on this development<br />
(FitzGerald and Holstein, 2006).<br />
Figure 1 illustrates that significant corruption of the signal can occur if tensors are processed on a<br />
component-by-component basis. The figure shows an image of the Laplacian Gxx+Gyy+Gzz of tensor<br />
data over a geological feature, which should always evaluate to zero. This is not true for data that has<br />
been treated on a component-by-component basis (Figure 1a, left panel). A strong correlation with<br />
geology is readily apparent. Using SLERP interpolation (Figure 1b, right panel), an image of the<br />
Laplacian quantity only shows numerical noise around zero, indicating that the Laplacian relationship<br />
is always honoured.<br />
(a)<br />
Figure 1. Images of the Laplacian quantity, Gxx+Gyy+Gzz of tensor data over a geological<br />
feature. The trace of tensors should always be zero to honour the Laplacian relationship. (a)<br />
Processing on a component-by-component basis produces a result that shows a clear correlation<br />
of the trace with geology. (b) Interpolating tensors using quaternion SLERP produces a result that<br />
only shows numerical noise.<br />
Grid denoising<br />
A recent paper by Pajot et al. (2008) shows the way forward for de-noising a tensor grid using a<br />
smoothing convolution kernel. We make use of linear differential relationships such as ∂yTxx = ∂xTxy,<br />
that are true in a finite difference sense (N.B., these are third order tensor components). These linear<br />
differentials link all the observed components and a filter design methodology has been developed to<br />
calculate appropriate tensor filters based upon minimizing residuals, in a least squares sense. We<br />
term this new gridding process MITRE, being short for Minimizing Tensor Residual Errors.<br />
73<br />
(b)