Travel Demand Model - OKI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

OKI/MVRPC Travel Demand Model – Version 6.0Table 2-7 Observed and Estimated County Trip Table, OKI Region, NHB PeakE S T I M A T E D T R I P T A B L EBut. Cler. Ham. War. Bne. Camp. Kent. Dear. CBD TotalButler 69,017 576 14,810 5,338 136 98 197 158 122 90,452Clermont 522 32,562 9,977 667 209 341 430 19 259 44,986Hamilton 17,061 10,750 349,396 6,360 1,781 3,754 6,549 1,422 15,372 412,445Warren 4,721 644 5,297 20,642 54 58 115 15 72 31,618Boone 114 231 1,143 58 31,429 1,148 8,605 184 400 43,312Campbell 137 440 3,837 101 1,085 11,471 5,689 32 1,708 24,500Kenton 250 528 5,586 143 8,700 6,231 31,524 129 2,675 55,766Dearborn 103 34 1,225 20 203 36 125 6,167 20 7,933Cinc. CBD 145 252 18,933 93 506 1,512 2,751 12 6,858 31,062Total 92,070 46,017 410,204 33,422 44,103 24,649 55,985 8,138 27,486 742,074O B S E R V E DT R I P T A B L EBut. Cler. Ham. War. Bne. Camp. Kent. Dear. CBD TotalButler 75,452 771 13,611 2,406 337 279 0 0 168 93,023Clermont 165 37,452 9,185 584 547 0 0 0 659 48,592Hamilton 15,014 13,458 332,215 5,640 1,983 5,135 6,565 367 10,785 391,163Warren 4,212 695 8,349 25,079 0 0 0 0 0 38,336Boone 353 157 2,422 0 30,765 700 4,273 278 705 39,652Campbell 0 559 3,061 0 1,753 19,744 1,262 0 834 27,213Kenton 349 447 4,253 0 6,777 2,172 33,370 0 2,049 49,417Dearborn 3 0 279 0 353 0 0 8,489 0 9,124Cinc. CBD 1,013 1,034 14,585 0 708 1,562 2,677 0 23,974 45,553Total 96,561 54,573 387,960 33,710 43,223 29,592 48,147 9,133 39,174 742,074E S T I MA T E D / O B S E R V E DBut. Cler. Ham. War. Bne. Camp. Kent. Dear. CBD TotalButler 0.9 0.7 1.1 2.2 0.4 0.4 n/a n/a 0.7 1.0Clermont 3.2 0.9 1.1 1.1 0.4 n/a n/a n/a 0.4 0.9Hamilton 1.1 0.8 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.7 1.0 3.9 1.4 1.1Warren 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.8 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.8Boone 0.3 1.5 0.5 n/a 1.0 1.6 2.0 0.7 0.6 1.1Campbell n/a 0.8 1.3 n/a 0.6 0.6 4.5 n/a 2.0 0.9Kenton 0.7 1.2 1.3 n/a 1.3 2.9 0.9 n/a 1.3 1.1Dearborn 31.3 n/a 4.4 n/a 0.6 n/a n/a 0.7 n/a 0.9Cinc. CBD 0.1 0.2 1.3 n/a 0.7 1.0 1.0 n/a 0.3 0.7Total 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.8 1.2 0.9 0.7 1.0For this comparison only, the observed trip table was uniformly factored to match the total number of estimated trips.Trip Distribution - Gravity Model Calibration 15
OKI/MVRPC Travel Demand Model – Version 6.0Table 2-8 Observed and Estimated County Trip Table, OKI Region, NHB Off PeakE S T I M A T E D T R I P T A B L EBut. Cler. Ham. War. Bne. Camp. Kent. Dear. CBD TotalButler 77,177 635 19,094 5,129 72 117 193 86 142 102,645Clermont 681 40,733 10,512 850 154 406 348 6 183 53,873Hamilton 20,418 11,759 409,687 7,491 1,406 2,628 4,369 1,383 12,672 471,813Warren 4,881 768 6,773 24,340 29 48 84 6 62 36,991Boone 61 150 1,034 28 37,190 1,278 8,714 199 367 49,021Campbell 131 432 2,813 76 1,297 17,475 5,840 21 1,182 29,267Kenton 217 398 3,662 88 9,124 6,301 43,056 102 1,586 64,534Dearborn 72 3 1,141 4 219 21 100 7,394 11 8,965Cinc. CBD 172 245 15,564 84 487 1,232 2,166 12 8,366 28,328Total 103,810 55,123 470,280 38,090 49,978 29,506 64,870 9,209 24,571 845,437O B S E R V E DT R I P T A B L EBut. Cler. Ham. War. Bne. Camp. Kent. Dear. CBD TotalButler 91,118 529 13,904 5,475 0 262 275 2 440 112,006Clermont 760 43,612 11,479 243 279 0 491 295 514 57,674Hamilton 12,803 14,673 382,320 3,017 2,487 3,998 4,610 1,088 10,890 435,886Warren 3,823 1,121 4,294 29,987 124 0 262 0 0 39,612Boone 0 642 1,909 0 37,155 1,593 6,759 276 836 49,170Campbell 552 66 2,786 244 659 23,279 3,340 0 219 31,145Kenton 262 1,047 5,336 0 5,146 3,311 48,025 0 820 63,946Dearborn 0 0 182 0 0 0 0 9,314 0 9,496Cinc. CBD 276 198 13,999 131 770 988 1,806 0 28,334 46,501Total 109,595 61,888 436,208 39,098 46,619 33,431 65,568 10,975 42,054 845,437E S T I MA T E D / O B S E R V E DBut. Cler. Ham. War. Bne. Camp. Kent. Dear. CBD TotalButler 0.8 1.2 1.4 0.9 n/a 0.4 0.7 50.0 0.3 0.9Clermont 0.9 0.9 0.9 3.5 0.6 n/a 0.7 0.0 0.4 0.9Hamilton 1.6 0.8 1.1 2.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.2 1.1Warren 1.3 0.7 1.6 0.8 0.2 n/a 0.3 n/a n/a 0.9Boone n/a 0.2 0.5 n/a 1.0 0.8 1.3 0.7 0.4 1.0Campbell 0.2 6.5 1.0 0.3 2.0 0.8 1.7 n/a 5.4 0.9Kenton 0.8 0.4 0.7 n/a 1.8 1.9 0.9 n/a 1.9 1.0Dearborn n/a n/a 6.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.8 n/a 0.9Cinc. CBD 0.6 1.2 1.1 0.6 0.6 1.2 1.2 n/a 0.3 0.6Total 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.6 1.0For this comparison only, the observed trip table was uniformly factored to match the total number of estimated trips.Trip Distribution - Gravity Model Calibration 16
Page 1 and 2:
APPENDIX F • TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL
Page 3 and 4:
OKI/MVRPCTravel Demand ModelVersion
Page 5 and 6:
Table of ContentsPart IPart IIPart
Page 7 and 8:
OKI/MVRPC Travel Demand Model - Ver
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Table A.1 (cont.)Zone System Equiva
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Table A.2Zone System Equivalences -
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Table A.3Zone System Equivalences -
Page 55 and 56:
Table B.1External Stations in the C
Page 57 and 58:
Table B.1External Stations in the C
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
User Documentation forAutomated Acc
Page 105 and 106:
[Transit Format][New Link Attribute
Page 107 and 108:
distance for each centroid or node.
Page 109 and 110:
Figure 1Example Control File for th
Page 111 and 112:
LinkType = 99VolumeDelay = 99Lanes
Page 113 and 114:
NetworkScale = 1.0 Scale factor to
Page 115 and 116:
Figure 4Example Output from DRVLINK
Page 117 and 118:
Appendix ASample EMME/2 Transit Lin
Page 119 and 120:
Appendix FTravel Demand ModelingTec
Page 121 and 122:
Index of TablesTable 2-1 Socio-Econ
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154: OKI/MVRPC Travel Demand Model - Ver
Page 187 and 188: Appendix FTravel Demand ModelingTec
Page 189 and 190: Index of TablesTable 2-1 Trip Lengt
Page 203: OKI/MVRPC Travel Demand Model - Ver
Page 227 and 228: Table of Contents1. Background ....
Page 229 and 230: Index of FiguresFigure 2-1 Alternat
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
NORTH-SOUTH TRANSPORTATION INITIATI
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Run # 63: Start with 7.17 estimatio
Page 283 and 284:
Run # 67:Split parking cost from ot
Page 285 and 286:
Run # 70a:Include zero-auto segment
Page 287 and 288:
Run # 71c:Repeat #71a with zero aut
Page 289 and 290:
Run # 71g:Repeat #71d with wait tim
Page 291 and 292:
Run # 73:Include residential densit
Page 293 and 294:
Run # 76:Nest: auto vs transitVaria
Page 295 and 296:
Run # 79:Repeat #72 with zero autos
Page 297 and 298:
Run # 80:Nest: auto vs. all othersV
Page 299 and 300:
Run # 82:(071h) nested: auto vs tra
Page 301 and 302:
Run #3VariableModeDrive Shared Ride
Page 303 and 304:
Run #8VariableModeDrive Shared Ride
Page 305 and 306:
Run #12 test: make aoc=10.5 instead
Page 307 and 308:
Run #29VariableModeDrive Shared Rid
Page 309 and 310:
Run #33VariableModeDrive Shared Rid
Page 311 and 312:
Run #37vot constrained to $7.00Vari
Page 313 and 314:
Run #30bSame as #30a, combine cost
Page 315 and 316:
Run #140 (same as run #40)vot const
Page 317 and 318:
Run #140b (same as run #40)vot cons
Page 319 and 320:
Run #141avot constrained to $3.00 &
Page 321 and 322:
Run #141cvot constrained to $3.00 &
Page 323 and 324:
Run # 1:Base RunVariablesModesDA Sh
Page 325 and 326:
Run # 5:Base Run with walk time set
Page 327 and 328:
Run # 8:Base Run, split walkVariabl
Page 329 and 330:
Run # 10: Nested structure (autos v
Page 331 and 332:
Part VITRIP ASSIGNMENT ANDVALIDATIO
Page 333 and 334:
Index of TablesTable 2-1 Average Ve
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
VOBFigure 4-8 Screenline Location -
Page 357 and 358:
2759OKI/MVRPC Travel Demand Model -
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Table of Contents1. Introduction...
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
Page 447 and 448:
Appendix FTravel Demand ModelingTec
Page 449 and 450:
Table of Contents1. Introduction...
Page 451 and 452:
2. Surveys and Other Datasets2.1 OK
Page 453 and 454:
Table 2-1 OKI Home Interview Survey
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Table 1-4 On-Board Survey Data Dict
Page 461 and 462:
2.3 External Station Survey - Conso
Page 463 and 464:
2.4 External Cordon Survey - Consol
Page 465 and 466:
2.5 External-External Trip Table fr
Page 467 and 468:
2.20 Screenline Shape File - Screen
show all

Travel Demand Model - OKI

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?