FINAL 2012-15 STIP

Recommendations

Info

HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP)Before the passage of SAFETEA-LU, federal safety funds weremade available through the Hazard Elimination Safety Program(HES). Funds were identified in a decentralized process throughlocal Area Transportation Partnerships (ATP).Traditionally, these projects were reactive in nature and weredesigned to improve an existing safety problem at a high crashlocation. Through the project development process, abenefit/cost ratio would be estimated based on the safetyimprovement at a particular location. A review of projectsfunded in recent history yields the following breakdown ofproject types. For intersections (the predominant projectlocation), most of the projects were new traffic signalinstallations usually including channelization and turn laneconstruction. Other intersection projects included: lighting,Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption (EVP) installation, andconversion to an interchange. For sections of roadway, most ofthe projects included general safety improvements – guardrail,shoulder improvements and turn lane construction. Other safetyprojects included: lighting, signing, and vertical and horizontalcurvature correction. Projects programmed in later years haveshifted to other areas including roundabouts and mediantreatments.ATPs have a safety program developed based on Minnesota dataand the Minnesota Strategic Highway Safety Plan.Projects were selected for the 2012-2015 STIP through acentralized process. A solicitation process was used for the localproject selection. Low cost, systematic, proactive projects wereprioritized over reactive single location improvements. Projectsfunded using the new process includes: systematic intersectionlighting, enhanced edge lines, rumble strips, chevrons on curvesand cable median barrier. The Office of Traffic, Safety andTechnology now approves all state and local HSIP projectsbefore they are included in the STIP.Projects were selected using the following criteria:• Ability to meet the intent of the SHSP• Fatal and A injury crashes per intersection or per mile• SHSP (critical emphasis areas)• Cost per intersection or cost per mile• ADT• Recommendation of a previous safety audit• Inclusion on the High Risk Rural Roads list or Top 5%listWith the passage of SAFETEA-LU and the development of theMinnesota Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), the types ofsafety projects funded with HSIP dollars has changed. In 2007and 2008, MnDOT transitioned from a purely reactive safetyprogram to a more proactive safety program where low-costsystematic strategies are emphasized. Beginning in 2009, allA-3(1)
For Greater Minnesota ATP’s the selection committee wascomprised of individuals from the following offices:• MnDOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology• FHWA (Advisory)• MnDOT Office of State Aid for Local Transportation(local solicitation only)For the Metro District ATP the selection committee wascomprised of individual representing:Federal HighwayFundsFigure A-3HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMBY YEAR($ MILLIONS)2012 2013 2014 2015 TOTAL20.4 18.5 20.5 20.5 79.9• MnDOT Metro Traffic (2)• Metro County Engineering (2)• Metro City Engineering (2)The Highway Safety Improvement Program funding included inthe 2012-2015 STIP is shown in Figure A-3.A-3(2)
Page 1:
STATE OF MINNESOTA2012-2015STATE TR
Page 4 and 5:
MinnesotaState Transportation Impro
Page 6 and 7:
PREFACEState of MinnesotaState Tran
Page 8 and 9:
*May not total correctly due to rou
Page 10 and 11:
statewide transportation planning.
Page 12 and 13:
Minnesota Statewide Transportation
Page 14 and 15:
the transit program is based on gra
Page 16 and 17:
Project selection includes two iter
Page 18 and 19:
III.PROGRAM LISTINGThe following se
Page 20:
FundBFBHBRBROSCBICMAQDPSERFFMFHFTAH
Page 24 and 25:
ATP: 1Fiscal Year: 2012STIP for FY
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 137 and 138:
ATP: MFiscal Year: 2012STIP for FY
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
ClearwaterSTATEWIDE RESERVESKittson
Page 187 and 188:
ATP: CFiscal Year: 2012STIP for FY
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198: ATP: CFiscal Year: 2015STIP for FY
Page 199 and 200: Illustrative ProjectsFiscal Years 2
Page 201 and 202: Greater MinnesotaMPO Programs Dulut
Page 203 and 204: GREATER MINNESOTA MPO PROGRAMSIn ac
Page 205 and 206: ATP: DULUTH-SUPERIOR METROPOLITAN I
Page 207 and 208: ATP: DULUTH-SUPERIOR METROPOLITAN I
Page 209 and 210: ATP: GRAND FORKS-EAST GRAND FORKS M
Page 211 and 212: ATP: GRAND FORKS-EAST GRAND FORKS M
Page 213 and 214: ATP: ST CLOUD AREA PLANNING ORGANIZ
Page 221 and 222: ATP: FARGO-MOORHEAD COUNCIL OF GOVE
Page 223 and 224: ATP: FARGO-MOORHEAD COUNCIL OF GOVE
Page 225 and 226: ATP: LACROSSE-LACRESCENT AREA PLANN
Page 227 and 228: ATP: LACROSSE-LACRESCENT AREA PLANN
Page 229 and 230: ATP: ROCHESTER-OLMSTED COUNCIL OF G
Page 231 and 232: ATP: ROCHESTER-OLMSTED COUNCIL OF G
Page 233 and 234: TransportationEnhancement Activitie
Page 235 and 236: Enhancement ProjectsFiscal Year: 20
Page 247: Highway SafetyImprovement Program(H
Page 251 and 252: Highway Safety Improvement Projects
Page 261 and 262: TRANSIT PROGRAMSFederal Transit Adm
Page 263 and 264: FTA SECTION 5307Fiscal Year: 2012ST
Page 299 and 300:
FTA SECTION 5316Fiscal Year: 2014ST
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
TRANSIT (FHWA)Fiscal Year: 2012STIP
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Indian ReservationRoads Program (IR
Page 319 and 320:
Indian Reservation Roads ProgramsFe
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Recreational TrailsProgramA-6
Page 349 and 350:
Project # Grantee Project Title Pro
Page 351 and 352:
Project # Grantee Project Title Pro
Page 353 and 354:
MnDOT STATE ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROGR
Page 355 and 356:
Appendix BOther Modal Programs Minn
Page 357 and 358:
MINNESOTA RAIL SERVICE IMPROVEMENTP
Page 359 and 360:
Port DevelopmentAssistance ProgramB
Page 361 and 362:
Figure B-2PORT DEVELOPMENT ASSISTAN
Page 363 and 364:
MnDOT Office ofAeronauticsAERONAUTI
Page 365 and 366:
To be eligible for federal grants-i
Page 367 and 368:
AERONAUTICSATP: 1Fiscal Year: 2012A
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
AERONAUTICSATP: MFiscal Year: 2012A
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
MnDOT’s Detailed Federal Fiscal C
Page 423 and 424:
Minnesota Projected Levels of AC Th
show all

FINAL 2012-15 STIP

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?