12.07.2015 Views

Untitled - HKU Libraries - The University of Hong Kong

Untitled - HKU Libraries - The University of Hong Kong

Untitled - HKU Libraries - The University of Hong Kong

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.10.6 <strong>The</strong> Diamond Hill LRT project was not evaluated without the Ma On Shan LRT, butestimates <strong>of</strong> the impact on economic results <strong>of</strong> omitting that line can be made. Asindicated above, projected passenger volumes on the Diamond Hill LRT would dropby about one third in the absence <strong>of</strong> the Ma On Shan LRT. Assuming revenues andeconomic benefits drop proportionately, the economic returns on the project wouldstill be rated HIGH with full time savings, dropping to MEDIUM with only one third<strong>of</strong> time savings counted.7.10.7 Taking Diamond Hill and Ma On Shan results together (which probably exaggeratesbenefits) the financial returns are rated as LOW for 1996 but MEDIUM for 2001.Economic returns for the joint project are rated as MEDIUM counting all timebenefits, but LOW with one third <strong>of</strong> time savings.Conclusions7.10.8 On the assumptions tested, the Diamond Hill LRT as an extension <strong>of</strong> the Ma OnShan LRT would represent a good rail-based transport investment. However, likeother light rail lines examined, the projected passenger volumes by 1996 alreadyreach design capacity and could well exceed capacity under other assumptions,in particular with stronger population growth in the corridor, with differentassumptions on fare structures and with an East Kowloon line built south <strong>of</strong>Diamond Hill. <strong>The</strong> extension <strong>of</strong> the MTR East Kowloon Line to Sha Tin would <strong>of</strong>fermuch greater capacity and would be the more natural project for this corridor. Hencea decision on the Diamond Hill LRT depends on a final decision on the East KowloonLine.7.11 KCR Main Line Extensions to Tsim Tsui and Sheung Wan7.11.1 <strong>The</strong> KCR main line currently terminates at Hung Horn which, while quite satisfactoryfor international passengers, is not very convenient for most <strong>of</strong> the urban railcommuters using the line. As a consequence, most passengers destined for the mainurban area <strong>of</strong> Kowloon or <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong> Island change at Kowloon Tong to the MTRsystem.7.11.2 CTS-2 looked at a proposal to improve the accessibility <strong>of</strong> the KCR main line byconstructing a-branch line from the KCR main line, starting at Mong Kok, runningalong the pre-1975 alignment <strong>of</strong> the KCR parallel with Chatham Road, andterminating near the Kowloon terminus <strong>of</strong> the Star Ferry. This branch line would beunderground for most <strong>of</strong> its length. An intermediate station would be provided toserve Tsim Sha Tsui East, and underground walkways would be provided to connectto the MTR station at Tsim Sha Tsui. With this branch line, the main line suburbanservices were assumed to terminate at Star Ferry on Kowloon side while theinternational traffic and freight traffic would continue to use Hung Horn Station.A further extension <strong>of</strong> this line across the Harbour to <strong>Hong</strong> <strong>Kong</strong> Island at SheungWan was also examined.Patronage Projections7.11.3 Passenger volumes were projected as follows (in thousands <strong>of</strong> passengers per day):Extension toMariner OnlyExtension toSheung Wan1996 2001 1996 2001Mong Kok to Hung Horn 162 177 101 111Mong Kok to TST East 165 195 311 366TST East to Star Ferry 100 123 240 295Cross-Harbour 193 237141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!