04.01.2013 Views

From the Beginning to Plato

From the Beginning to Plato

From the Beginning to Plato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FROM THE BEGINNING TO PLATO 97<br />

It is wise for those who have listened not <strong>to</strong> me but <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> logos <strong>to</strong> agree<br />

that all things are one, Heraclitus says.<br />

(B50) 80<br />

But ano<strong>the</strong>r way of expressing <strong>the</strong> same idea is that of a harmony, or connection<br />

among things:<br />

They do not understand how in differing it agrees with itself: a backwardturning<br />

structure like that of a bow or a lyre.<br />

(B51) 81<br />

Exactly how <strong>the</strong> structure (harmoniē) of a bow or lyre illustrates <strong>the</strong> agreement<br />

in difference has been <strong>the</strong> subject of some discussion. One possibility is <strong>the</strong><br />

equilibrium of tension between two opposing forces, ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> technique of<br />

plucking or drawing <strong>the</strong> string in such a way that it springs back <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> original<br />

position. The former is a more static image: a world in which equilibrium<br />

ensures continuity without radical change; <strong>the</strong> latter is more dynamic, capturing<br />

<strong>the</strong> idea of a world engaged in reciprocal change between opposing states.<br />

Hippolytus, after quoting this passage, goes on <strong>to</strong> tell us that for Heraclitus a<br />

harmony or connection that is not apparent is more powerful than one that is<br />

apparent (B54). 82 Hippolytus’ discussion is concerned with <strong>the</strong> use of sense<br />

perception and <strong>the</strong> value placed upon empirical evidence, but it seems clear that<br />

Heraclitus had some claim <strong>to</strong> make about <strong>the</strong> internal connection between things<br />

that are, at <strong>the</strong> superficial level, unconnected, or indeed opposed. Indeed his<br />

point seems <strong>to</strong> be that that is <strong>the</strong> more important relation: that what appears<br />

obvious is not always <strong>the</strong> locus of <strong>the</strong> most profound and telling connections. 83 It<br />

is not always by looking at things that appear immediately promising or rich in<br />

significance that we shall discover what is really important: those who search for<br />

gold dig up a great deal of earth and discover little (B22). 84<br />

A number of o<strong>the</strong>r matters are said <strong>to</strong> be particularly obscure or hidden: <strong>the</strong><br />

logos of <strong>the</strong> soul, which we have seen cannot be located in a material identity, is<br />

one of <strong>the</strong>m:<br />

You would not discover <strong>the</strong> limits of soul if you traversed every path; that<br />

is how profound its logos is.<br />

(B45) 85<br />

Nature is ano<strong>the</strong>r. 86 Discovering <strong>the</strong> truth is a matter of looking for something<br />

that is not obvious or expected, where you least anticipate it:<br />

You will not discover what is unexpected unless it is expected, because it<br />

is impossible <strong>to</strong> deduce and obscure.<br />

(B18) 87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!