04.01.2013 Views

From the Beginning to Plato

From the Beginning to Plato

From the Beginning to Plato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The verb einai (‘be’) and <strong>the</strong> concept of being in early Greek<br />

and in Parmenides:<br />

4.31 Hölscher, U.Der Sinn vom Sein in der älteren griechischen Philosophie,<br />

Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophischhis<strong>to</strong>rische<br />

Klasse, Jahrgang 1976, 3. Abhandlung, Heidelberg, Carl Winter<br />

Universitätsverlag, 1976.<br />

4.32 Kahn, C.H. The Verb ‘Be’ in Ancient Greek, Foundations of Language, suppl. series<br />

16, Dordrecht and Bos<strong>to</strong>n, Reidel, 1973.<br />

4.33—‘Why existence does not emerge as a distinct concept in Greek philosophy’, Archiv<br />

für Geschichte der Philosophie 58 (1976): 323–34.<br />

4.34 Mat<strong>the</strong>n, M. ‘Greek on<strong>to</strong>logy and <strong>the</strong> “Is” of truth’, Phronesis 28 (1983): 113–35.<br />

Methods of argument, and <strong>the</strong> nature of thinking<br />

4.35 Lesher, J. ‘Parmenides’ critique of thinking: <strong>the</strong> poludéris elenchos of Fragment 7’,<br />

Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2 (1984): 1–30.<br />

4.36 Mourela<strong>to</strong>s, A.P.D. ‘Mind’s commitment <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> real: Parmenides B 8.34–41’, in<br />

An<strong>to</strong>n and Kustas [2.16]: 59–80.<br />

The choice of ways and <strong>the</strong> rejection of ‘is not’<br />

4.37 Finkelberg, A. ‘Parmenides’ foundation of <strong>the</strong> way of Truth’, Oxford Studies in<br />

Ancient Philosophy 6 (1988): 39–67.<br />

4.38 Hintikka, J. ‘Parmenides’ Cogi<strong>to</strong> argument’, Ancient Philosophy 1 (1980): 5–16.<br />

The nature of what is<br />

FROM THE BEGINNING TO PLATO 157<br />

4.39 Barnes, J. ‘Parmenides and <strong>the</strong> Eleatic One’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie<br />

61 (1979): 1–21.<br />

4.40 Finkelberg, A. ‘Parmenides between material and logical monism’, Archiv für<br />

Geschichte der Philosophie 70 (1988): 1–14.<br />

4.41 Furth, M. ‘Elements of Eleatic on<strong>to</strong>logy’, in Mourela<strong>to</strong>s [2.19]: 241–70.<br />

4.42 Kahn, C.H. ‘The <strong>the</strong>sis of Parmenides’, Review of Metaphysics 22 (1969): 700–24.<br />

4.43 ——‘More on Parmenides’, Review of Metaphysics 23 (1969): 333–40.<br />

4.44 Ketchum, R.J. ‘Parmenides on what <strong>the</strong>re is’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20<br />

(1990): 167–90.<br />

4.45 Malcolm, J. ‘On avoiding <strong>the</strong> void’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 9 (1991):<br />

75–94.<br />

4.46 Owen, G.E.L. ‘Eleatic questions’, Classical Quarterly NS 10 (1960): 84–102; repr.<br />

in Allen and Furley [2.15], vol. 2; 48–81, and in M.Nussbaum (ed.) Logic, Science<br />

and Dialectic: Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy, London, Duckworth, 1986:<br />

3–26.<br />

4.47—— ‘Pla<strong>to</strong> and Parmenides on <strong>the</strong> timeless present’, Monist 50 (1966): 317–40; repr.<br />

in Mourela<strong>to</strong>s [2.19]; 271–92, and in Nussbaum. (see [4.46]): 27–44.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!