04.01.2013 Views

From the Beginning to Plato

From the Beginning to Plato

From the Beginning to Plato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

266 FROM THE BEGINNING TO PLATO<br />

The question whe<strong>the</strong>r Archytas’ tuning is ma<strong>the</strong>matical manipulation without<br />

musical significance must be considered moot. Barker ([8.14], 46–52) has argued<br />

that musical practice may have played a much more significant role in Archytas’<br />

<strong>the</strong>orizing than is usually allowed, but he leaves no doubt that a kind of<br />

ma<strong>the</strong>matical a priorism, particularly <strong>the</strong> faith in <strong>the</strong> consonance of epimorics,<br />

played a central role in Archytas’ musical thought. Moreover, a passage in<br />

Porphyry ([8.73], 107.15–108.21, DK 47 A 17) suggests that Archytas used very<br />

arbitrary numerical manipulations <strong>to</strong> determine <strong>the</strong> relative concordance of octave,<br />

fifth, and fourth, subtracting 1 from each term of <strong>the</strong> corresponding ratios, adding<br />

<strong>the</strong> results for each interval and taking lower sums <strong>to</strong> mean greater concord;<br />

since<br />

, he declared <strong>the</strong> octave <strong>to</strong> be more concordant<br />

than <strong>the</strong> fifth, which, in turn is more concordant than <strong>the</strong> fourth.<br />

This mixture of ma<strong>the</strong>matical reasoning and ma<strong>the</strong>matical mystification<br />

makes it difficult for us <strong>to</strong> classify <strong>the</strong> musical work of Archytas (and even of<br />

Euclid) as ei<strong>the</strong>r science or numerology. 22 It is difficult <strong>to</strong> believe that Archytas<br />

did not know <strong>the</strong> truth of VIII.7 and 8, at least for <strong>the</strong> case of one mean<br />

proportional. But it is hard <strong>to</strong> see how he could even begin <strong>to</strong> think about such<br />

results without a well-developed idea of arithmetical reasoning and proof. 23<br />

PART TWO:<br />

THE SIXTH AND FIFTH CENTURIES<br />

(1)<br />

Thales and Early Greek Geometry<br />

In addition <strong>to</strong> his general remarks about Thales quoted in <strong>the</strong> introduction<br />

Proclus ([8.74]) records four of Thales’ ma<strong>the</strong>matical achievements, twice citing<br />

Eudemus as authority. I quote <strong>the</strong> passages:<br />

(a) The famous Thales is said <strong>to</strong> have been <strong>the</strong> first <strong>to</strong> prove that <strong>the</strong> circle is<br />

bisected by <strong>the</strong> diameter. (157.10–11)<br />

(b) We are indebted <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> ancient Thales for <strong>the</strong> discovery of this <strong>the</strong>orem<br />

[asserting <strong>the</strong> equality of <strong>the</strong> base angles of an isosceles triangle] and many<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs. For he, it is said, was <strong>the</strong> first <strong>to</strong> recognize and assert that <strong>the</strong> angles<br />

at <strong>the</strong> base of any isosceles triangle are equal, although he expressed himself<br />

more archaically and called <strong>the</strong> equal angles similar. (250.20–251.2)<br />

(c) According <strong>to</strong> Eudemus, this <strong>the</strong>orem [asserting <strong>the</strong> equality of <strong>the</strong> nonadjacent<br />

angles made by two intersecting straight lines]…was first<br />

discovered by Thales. (299.1–4)<br />

(d) In his his<strong>to</strong>ry of geometry Eudemus attributes <strong>to</strong> Thales this <strong>the</strong>orem<br />

[asserting <strong>the</strong> congruence of triangles with two sides and one angle equal].<br />

He says that <strong>the</strong> method by which Thales is said <strong>to</strong> have determined <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!