From the Beginning to Plato

248 THE SOPHISTS
Sprague [7.4]: 294–301.
Euthydemus and Dionysodorus
Text (in translation)
Studies
7.44 Chance, T.H. Plato’s Euthydemus—Analysis of What is and is not Philosophy,
Berkeley, Calif., and London, University of California Press, 1992.
7.45 Hawtrey, R.S.W. Commentary on Plato’s Euthydemus, Philadelphia, Pa., American
Philological Society, 1981.
7.46 Sprague, R.K. Plato’s Use of Fallacy, A Study of the Euthydemus and Some Other
Dialogues, London, Routledge, 1962:1–11.
Antisthenes
7.47 Brancacci, A. OIKEIOS LOGOS, la filosofia di Antistene, Naples, Bibliopolis, 1990.
7.48 Guthrie [2.13], vol. III: 304–11.
7.49 Rankin, H.D. Sophists, Socratics and Cynics, London, Croom Helm: 219–28.
Dissoi Logoi
7.50 Boot, F. ‘The philosophical position of the author of the Dissoi Logoi’,
Philosophical Inquiry 4 (1982): 118–23.
7.51 Conley, T.M. ‘Dating the so-called Dissoi Logoi, a cautionary note’, Ancient
Philosophy 5 (1985): 59–65.
7.52 Robinson, T.M. Contrasting Arguments—an edition of the Dissoi Logoi, New York,
Arno Press, 1979. Reviewed by C.J.Classen, Phoenix 36 (1982): 83–7.
The Anonymus lamblichi
7.53 Cole, A.T. ‘The Anonymus lamblichi and his place in Greek political thought’,
Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 65 (1961): 127–63.
7.54 Levi [7.16], ch. 6, first published under the name D.Viale ‘L’anonimo di Giamblicho’,
Sophia 9 (1941): 321–30. German translation by C.J.Classen, in Classen [7.5]:
612–26.